BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytomas are tumours arising from chromaffin tissue located in the adrenal medulla associated with typical symptoms and signs which may occasionally develop metastases, which are defined as the presence of tumour cells at sites where these cells are not found. This retrospective analysis was focused on clinical, genetic and histopathologic characteristics of primary metastatic versus primary benign pheochromocytomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 41 subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma and 108 subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytoma. We assessed dimension and biochemical profile of the primary tumour, age at presentation and time to develop metastases. RESULTS: Subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma presented at a significantly younger age (41·4 ± 14·7 vs. 50·2 ± 13·7 years; P < 0·001) with larger primary tumours (8·38 ± 3·27 vs. 6·18 ± 2·75 cm; P < 0·001) and secreted more frequently norepinephrine (95·1% vs. 83·3%; P = 0·046) compared to subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytomas. No significant differences were found in the incidence of genetic mutations in both groups of subjects (25·7% in the metastatic group and 14·7% in the benign group; P = 0·13). From available histopathologic markers of potential malignancy, only necrosis occurred more frequently in subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma (27·6% vs. 0%; P < 0·001). The median time to develop metastases was 3·6 years with the longest interval 24 years. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, regardless of a genetic background, the size of a primary pheochromocytoma and age of its first presentation are two independent risk factors associated with the development of metastatic disease. European Journal of Clinical Investigation
BACKGROUND:Pheochromocytomas are tumours arising from chromaffin tissue located in the adrenal medulla associated with typical symptoms and signs which may occasionally develop metastases, which are defined as the presence of tumour cells at sites where these cells are not found. This retrospective analysis was focused on clinical, genetic and histopathologic characteristics of primary metastatic versus primary benign pheochromocytomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 41 subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma and 108 subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytoma. We assessed dimension and biochemical profile of the primary tumour, age at presentation and time to develop metastases. RESULTS: Subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma presented at a significantly younger age (41·4 ± 14·7 vs. 50·2 ± 13·7 years; P < 0·001) with larger primary tumours (8·38 ± 3·27 vs. 6·18 ± 2·75 cm; P < 0·001) and secreted more frequently norepinephrine (95·1% vs. 83·3%; P = 0·046) compared to subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytomas. No significant differences were found in the incidence of genetic mutations in both groups of subjects (25·7% in the metastatic group and 14·7% in the benign group; P = 0·13). From available histopathologic markers of potential malignancy, only necrosis occurred more frequently in subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma (27·6% vs. 0%; P < 0·001). The median time to develop metastases was 3·6 years with the longest interval 24 years. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, regardless of a genetic background, the size of a primary pheochromocytoma and age of its first presentation are two independent risk factors associated with the development of metastatic disease. European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Authors: Raymon H Grogan; Elliot Mitmaker; Menno R Vriens; Avital Harari; Jessica E Gosnell; Wen T Shen; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Herbert Chen; Rebecca S Sippel; M Sue O'Dorisio; Aaron I Vinik; Ricardo V Lloyd; Karel Pacak Journal: Pancreas Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: David Wu; Arthur S Tischler; Ricardo V Lloyd; Ronald A DeLellis; Ronald de Krijger; Francien van Nederveen; Vânia Nosé Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Yuejuan Qin; Li Yao; Elizabeth E King; Kalyan Buddavarapu; Romina E Lenci; E Sandra Chocron; James D Lechleiter; Meghan Sass; Neil Aronin; Francesca Schiavi; Francesca Boaretto; Giuseppe Opocher; Rodrigo A Toledo; Sergio P A Toledo; Charles Stiles; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Patricia L M Dahia Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-02-14 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Vivian E Strong; Timothy Kennedy; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Laura Tang; Jonathan Coleman; Yuman Fong; Murray Brennan; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Li Yao; Marta Barontini; Bruno Niederle; Marion Jech; Roswitha Pfragner; Patricia L M Dahia Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Niamh X Cawley; William C Wetsel; Saravana R K Murthy; Joshua J Park; Karel Pacak; Y Peng Loh Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: David Taïeb; Alexandre Kaliski; Carsten C Boedeker; Victoria Martucci; Tito Fojo; John R Adler; Karel Pacak Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Ozgur Mete; Arthur S Tischler; Ronald de Krijger; Anne Marie McNicol; Graeme Eisenhofer; Karel Pacak; Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Hana Turkova; Tamara Prodanov; Marek Maly; Victoria Martucci; Karen Adams; Jiri Widimsky; Clara C Chen; Alexander Ling; Electron Kebebew; Constantine A Stratakis; Tito Fojo; Karel Pacak Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.443