Literature DB >> 21691413

On the use of a PM(2.5) exposure simulator to explain birthweight.

Veronica J Berrocal1, Alan E Gelfand, David M Holland, Janet Burke, Marie Lynn Miranda.   

Abstract

In relating pollution to birth outcomes, maternal exposure has usually been described using monitoring data. Such characterization provides a misrepresentation of exposure as it (i) does not take into account the spatial misalignment between an individual's residence and monitoring sites, and (ii) it ignores the fact that individuals spend most of their time indoors and typically in more than one location. In this paper, we break with previous studies by using a stochastic simulator to describe personal exposure (to particulate matter) and then relate simulated exposures at the individual level to the health outcome (birthweight) rather than aggregating to a selected spatial unit.We propose a hierarchical model that, at the first stage, specifies a linear relationship between birthweight and personal exposure, adjusting for individual risk factors and introduces random spatial effects for the census tract of maternal residence. At the second stage, our hierarchical model specifies the distribution of each individual's personal exposure using the empirical distribution yielded by the stochastic simulator as well as a model for the spatial random effects.We have applied our framework to analyze birthweight data from 14 counties in North Carolina in years 2001 and 2002. We investigate whether there are certain aspects and time windows of exposure that are more detrimental to birthweight by building different exposure metrics which we incorporate, one by one, in our hierarchical model. To assess the difference in relating ambient exposure to birthweight versus personal exposure to birthweight, we compare estimates of the effect of air pollution obtained from hierarchical models that linearly relate ambient exposure and birthweight versus those obtained from our modeling framework.Our analysis does not show a significant effect of PM(2.5) on birthweight for reasons which we discuss. However, our modeling framework serves as a template for analyzing the relationship between personal exposure and longer term health endpoints.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691413      PMCID: PMC3116241          DOI: 10.1002/env.1086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environmetrics        ISSN: 1099-095X            Impact factor:   1.900


  51 in total

1.  Association of very low birth weight with exposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates.

Authors:  J F Rogers; S J Thompson; C L Addy; R E McKeown; D J Cowen; P Decouflé
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality from air pollution in the United States.

Authors:  J M Samet; S L Zeger; F Dominici; F Curriero; I Coursac; D W Dockery; J Schwartz; A Zanobetti
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2000-06

3.  The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec. 1. Nonaccidental mortality.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; R T Burnett; J C Bailar; J Brook; Y Bonvalot; R Tamblyn; R Singh; M F Valois
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Coarse and fine particles and daily mortality in the Coachella Valley, California: a follow-up study.

Authors:  B D Ostro; R Broadwin; M J Lipsett
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

5.  Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993.

Authors:  B Ritz; F Yu; G Chapa; S Fruin
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  The association between air pollution and heart failure, arrhythmia, embolism, thrombosis, and other cardiovascular causes of death in a time series study.

Authors:  G Hoek; B Brunekreef; P Fischer; J van Wijnen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Airborne particles are a risk factor for hospital admissions for heart and lung disease.

Authors:  A Zanobetti; J Schwartz; D W Dockery
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Impact of air pollution on reproductive health.

Authors:  R Srám
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.

Authors:  S L Zeger; D Thomas; F Dominici; J M Samet; J Schwartz; D Dockery; A Cohen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity.

Authors:  M Bobak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Time series analysis of personal exposure to ambient air pollution and mortality using an exposure simulator.

Authors:  Howard H Chang; Montserrat Fuentes; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  A spectral method for spatial downscaling.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Howard H Chang; Kristen M Foley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Effects of ambient air pollution measurement error on health effect estimates in time-series studies: a simulation-based analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Strickland; Katherine M Gass; Gretchen T Goldman; James A Mulholland
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Comparing exposure metrics for the effects of fine particulate matter on emergency hospital admissions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mannshardt; Katarina Sucic; Wan Jiao; Francesca Dominici; H Christopher Frey; Brian Reich; Montserrat Fuentes
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Commuting-adjusted short-term health impact assessment of airborne fine particles with uncertainty quantification via Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Michela Baccini; Laura Grisotto; Dolores Catelan; Dario Consonni; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Annibale Biggeri
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  The association between fine particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Sun; Xiping Luo; Chunmei Zhao; Rachel Wai Chung Ng; Chi Eung Danforn Lim; Bo Zhang; Tao Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  A longitudinal study of exposure to fine particulate matter during pregnancy, small-for-gestational age births, and birthweight percentile for gestational age in a statewide birth cohort.

Authors:  Mercedes A Bravo; Marie Lynn Miranda
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Assessing the impact of race, social factors and air pollution on birth outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Simone C Gray; Sharon E Edwards; Bradley D Schultz; Marie Lynn Miranda
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.