Literature DB >> 21689823

Intact protein separation by chromatographic and/or electrophoretic techniques for top-down proteomics.

Anna Laura Capriotti1, Chiara Cavaliere, Patrizia Foglia, Roberto Samperi, Aldo Laganà.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry used in combination with a wide variety of separation methods is the principal methodology for proteomics. In bottom-up approach, proteins are cleaved with a specific proteolytic enzyme, followed by peptide separation and MS identification. In top-down approach intact proteins are introduced into the mass spectrometer. The ions generated by electrospray ionization are then subjected to gas-phase separation, fragmentation, fragment separation, and automated interpretation of mass spectrometric and chromatographic data yielding both the molecular weight of the intact protein and the protein fragmentation pattern. This approach requires high accuracy mass measurement analysers capable of separating the multi-charged isotopic cluster of proteins, such as hybrid ion trap-Fourier transform instruments (LTQ-FTICR, LTQ-Orbitrap). Front-end separation technologies tailored for proteins are of primary importance to implement top-down proteomics. This review intends to provide the state of art of protein chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods suitable for MS coupling, and to illustrate both monodimensional and multidimensional approaches used for LC-MS top-down proteomics. In addition, some recent progresses in protein chromatography that may provide an alternative to those currently employed are also discussed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21689823     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  10 in total

1.  Dephosphorylation of cardiac proteins in vitro - a matter of phosphatase specificity.

Authors:  Cathrine Husberg; Giulio Agnetti; Ronald J Holewinski; Geir Christensen; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Proteoform Retention and Migration Time Prediction in Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Wenrong Chen; Elijah N McCool; Liangliang Sun; Yong Zang; Xia Ning; Xiaowen Liu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.370

Review 3.  Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Top Down proteomics: facts and perspectives.

Authors:  Adam D Catherman; Owen S Skinner; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Analysis of protein isoforms: can we do it better?

Authors:  Miroslava Stastna; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Bifan Chen; Kyle A Brown; Ziqing Lin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Complete protein characterization using top-down mass spectrometry and ultraviolet photodissociation.

Authors:  Jared B Shaw; Wenzong Li; Dustin D Holden; Yan Zhang; Jens Griep-Raming; Ryan T Fellers; Bryan P Early; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics.

Authors:  John C Tran; Leonid Zamdborg; Dorothy R Ahlf; Ji Eun Lee; Adam D Catherman; Kenneth R Durbin; Jeremiah D Tipton; Adaikkalam Vellaichamy; John F Kellie; Mingxi Li; Cong Wu; Steve M M Sweet; Bryan P Early; Nertila Siuti; Richard D LeDuc; Philip D Compton; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Efficient separations of intact proteins using slip-flow with nano-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zhen Wu; Bingchuan Wei; Ximo Zhang; Mary J Wirth
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Identification of intact high molecular weight glutenin subunits from the wheat proteome using combined liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bert Lagrain; Markus Brunnbauer; Ine Rombouts; Peter Koehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.