Literature DB >> 21688765

Comparison of intraocular lens decentration parameters after femtosecond and manual capsulotomies.

Zoltán Zsolt Nagy1, Kinga Kránitz, Agnes I Takacs, Kata Miháltz, Illés Kovács, Michael C Knorz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a laser technique and manual technique to perform capsulorrhexis in cataract eyes.
METHODS: Anterior capsulotomy was performed with an intraocular femtosecond laser (LenSx Lasers Inc) in 54 eyes (FS group) and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis was performed in 57 eyes (CCC group). Circularity and area of capsulotomy and IOL decentration were measured using Photoshop CS4 Extended (Adobe Systems Inc) 1 week after surgery. Average keratometry, axial length, and preoperative anterior chamber depth were examined with the Lenstar LS 900 (Haag-Streit AG).
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in axial length, preoperative refractive state, and in the area of capsulotomy. Circularity values were significantly better in the FS group (P=.032). We found incomplete overlap of capsulotomies in 28% of eyes in the CCC group and 11% in the FS group (P=.033). Significant correlations were noted between axial length and area of capsulotomy, and between average keratometry and area of the capsulotomy in the CCC group (R=0.278, P=.036; and R=-0.29, P=.033, respectively), but both did not correlate in the FS group (P>.05). In the CCC group, the pupillary area correlated significantly with the area of the capsulotomy (R=0.27, P=.039). Significant correlation was noted between IOL decentration and axial length in the CCC group (R=0.30, P=.026), but there was no correlation in the FS group (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser capsulorrhexis was more regularly shaped, showed better centration, and showed a better intraocular lens/capsule overlap than manual capsulorrhexis. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21688765     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110607-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  59 in total

1.  Calculation of ophthalmic viscoelastic device-induced focus shift during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Carolina P de Freitas; Florence Cabot; Fabrice Manns; William Culbertson; Sonia H Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Cell death and survival following manual and femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy in age-related cataract.

Authors:  Andrea Krisztina Sükösd; Judit Rapp; Diána Feller; György Sétáló; Beáta Gáspár; Judit E Pongrácz; Hajnalka Ábrahám; Zsolt Biró
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucia Bascaran; Txomin Alberdi; Itziar Martinez-Soroa; Cristina Sarasqueta; Javier Mendicute
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  The journey to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: new beginnings or a false dawn?

Authors:  S Trikha; A M J Turnbull; R J Morris; D F Anderson; P Hossain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual capsulotomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dao-Wei Qian; Hai-Ke Guo; Shang-Li Jin; Hong-Yang Zhang; Yuan-Cun Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.

Authors:  Alexander C Day; Jennifer M Burr; Kate Bennett; Rachael Hunter; Catey Bunce; Caroline J Doré; Mayank A Nanavaty; Kamaljit S Balaggan; Mark R Wilkins
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Femtosecond cataract surgery: A review of current literature and the experience from an initial installation.

Authors:  Chris Hodge; Shveta Jindal Bali; Michael Lawless; Colin Chan; Timothy Roberts; David Ng; Simon Chen; Paul Hughes; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

8.  Clinical outcomes and complications between FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a PRISMA-compliant Meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Li Chen; Chen Hu; Xiao Lin; Hao-Yu Li; Yi Du; Yi-Hua Yao; Jun Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Advances in lens implant technology.

Authors:  Daniel Kook; Anselm Kampik; Alois K Dexl; Nicole Zimmermann; Adrian Glasser; Martin Baumeister; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: a current review.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Daniel S Churgin; Maylon Hsu
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.