Literature DB >> 21687809

Testing and Estimating Shape-Constrained Nonparametric Density and Regression in the Presence of Measurement Error.

Raymond J Carroll1, Aurore Delaigle, Peter Hall.   

Abstract

In many applications we can expect that, or are interested to know if, a density function or a regression curve satisfies some specific shape constraints. For example, when the explanatory variable, X, represents the value taken by a treatment or dosage, the conditional mean of the response, Y , is often anticipated to be a monotone function of X. Indeed, if this regression mean is not monotone (in the appropriate direction) then the medical or commercial value of the treatment is likely to be significantly curtailed, at least for values of X that lie beyond the point at which monotonicity fails. In the case of a density, common shape constraints include log-concavity and unimodality. If we can correctly guess the shape of a curve, then nonparametric estimators can be improved by taking this information into account. Addressing such problems requires a method for testing the hypothesis that the curve of interest satisfies a shape constraint, and, if the conclusion of the test is positive, a technique for estimating the curve subject to the constraint. Nonparametric methodology for solving these problems already exists, but only in cases where the covariates are observed precisely. However in many problems, data can only be observed with measurement errors, and the methods employed in the error-free case typically do not carry over to this error context. In this paper we develop a novel approach to hypothesis testing and function estimation under shape constraints, which is valid in the context of measurement errors. Our method is based on tilting an estimator of the density or the regression mean until it satisfies the shape constraint, and we take as our test statistic the distance through which it is tilted. Bootstrap methods are used to calibrate the test. The constrained curve estimators that we develop are also based on tilting, and in that context our work has points of contact with methodology in the error-free case.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21687809      PMCID: PMC3115552          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  3 in total

1.  A Design-Adaptive Local Polynomial Estimator for the Errors-in-Variables Problem.

Authors:  Aurore Delaigle; Jianqing Fan; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Monotone smoothing with application to dose-response curves and the assessment of synergism.

Authors:  C Kelly; J Rice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  An Analysis of the Areas Occupied by Vessels in the Ocular Surface of Diabetic Patients: An Application of a Nonparametric Tilted Additive Model.

Authors:  Farzaneh Boroumand; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Touka Banaee; Hamidreza Pourreza; Hassan Doosti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.