Literature DB >> 21685607

EU-ADR healthcare database network vs. spontaneous reporting system database: preliminary comparison of signal detection.

Gianluca Trifirò1, Vaishali Patadia, Martijn J Schuemie, Preciosa M Coloma, Rosa Gini, Ron Herings, Julia Hippisley-Cox, Giampiero Mazzaglia, Carlo Giaquinto, Lorenza Scotti, Lars Pedersen, Paul Avillach, Miriam C J M Sturkenboom, Johan van der Lei.   

Abstract

The EU-ADR project aims to exploit different European electronic healthcare records (EHR) databases for drug safety signal detection. In this paper we report the preliminary results concerning the comparison of signal detection between EU-ADR network and two spontaneous reporting databases, the Food and Drug Administration and World Health Organization databases. EU-ADR data sources consist of eight databases in four countries (Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, and United Kingdom) that are virtually linked through distributed data network. A custom-built software (Jerboa©) elaborates harmonized input data that are produced locally and generates aggregated data which are then stored in a central repository. Those data are subsequently analyzed through different statistics (i.e. Longitudinal Gamma Poisson Shrinker). As potential signals, all the drugs that are associated to six events of interest (bullous eruptions - BE, acute renal failure - ARF, acute myocardial infarction - AMI, anaphylactic shock - AS, rhabdomyolysis - RHABD, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding - UGIB) have been detected via different data mining techniques in the two systems. Subsequently a comparison concerning the number of drugs that could be investigated and the potential signals detected for each event in the spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) and EU-ADR network was made. SRSs could explore, as potential signals, a larger number of drugs for the six events, in comparison to EU-ADR (range: 630-3,393 vs. 87-856), particularly for those events commonly thought to be potentially drug-induced (i.e. BE: 3,393 vs. 228). The highest proportion of signals detected in SRSs was found for BE, ARF and AS, while for ARF, and UGIB in EU-ADR. In conclusion, it seems that EU-ADR longitudinal database network may complement traditional spontaneous reporting system for signal detection, especially for those adverse events that are frequent in general population and are not commonly thought to be drug-induced. The methodology for signal detection in EU-ADR is still under development and testing phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21685607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  26 in total

1.  Clinical decision support for atypical orders: detection and warning of atypical medication orders submitted to a computerized provider order entry system.

Authors:  Allie D Woods; David P Mulherin; Allen J Flynn; James G Stevenson; Christopher R Zimmerman; Bruce W Chaffee
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Postmarketing safety surveillance : where does signal detection using electronic healthcare records fit into the big picture?

Authors:  Preciosa M Coloma; Gianluca Trifirò; Vaishali Patadia; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  The contribution of the vaccine adverse event text mining system to the classification of possible Guillain-Barré syndrome reports.

Authors:  T Botsis; E J Woo; R Ball
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  The role of electronic healthcare record databases in paediatric drug safety surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sandra de Bie; Preciosa M Coloma; Carmen Ferrajolo; Katia M C Verhamme; Gianluca Trifirò; Martijn J Schuemie; Sabine M J M Straus; Rosa Gini; Ron Herings; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Gino Picelli; Arianna Ghirardi; Lars Pedersen; Bruno H C Stricker; Johan van der Lei; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Time Series Disturbance Detection for Hypothesis-Free Signal Detection in Longitudinal Observational Databases.

Authors:  Ed Whalen; Manfred Hauben; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Idiopathic acute liver injury in paediatric outpatients: incidence and signal detection in two European countries.

Authors:  Carmen Ferrajolo; Katia M C Verhamme; Gianluca Trifirò; Geert W 't Jong; Carlo Giaquinto; Gino Picelli; Alessandro Oteri; Sandra de Bie; Vera E Valkhoff; Martijn J Schuemie; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Claudio Cricelli; Francesco Rossi; Annalisa Capuano; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  The past, present and perhaps future of pharmacovigilance: homage to Folke Sjoqvist.

Authors:  Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A reference standard for evaluation of methods for drug safety signal detection using electronic healthcare record databases.

Authors:  Preciosa M Coloma; Paul Avillach; Francesco Salvo; Martijn J Schuemie; Carmen Ferrajolo; Antoine Pariente; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Mariam Molokhia; Vaishali Patadia; Johan van der Lei; Miriam Sturkenboom; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Useful Interplay Between Spontaneous ADR Reports and Electronic Healthcare Records in Signal Detection.

Authors:  Alexandra C Pacurariu; Sabine M Straus; Gianluca Trifirò; Martijn J Schuemie; Rosa Gini; Ron Herings; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Gino Picelli; Lorenza Scotti; Lars Pedersen; Peter Arlett; Johan van der Lei; Miriam C Sturkenboom; Preciosa M Coloma
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Predictive modeling of structured electronic health records for adverse drug event detection.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Aron Henriksson; Lars Asker; Henrik Boström
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.