Literature DB >> 2168453

The measurement of blood pressure: sitting or supine, once or twice?

M J Jamieson1, J Webster, S Philips, T A Jeffers, A K Scott, O J Robb, H G Lovell, J C Petrie.   

Abstract

In 166 patients attending a hypertension review clinic, we compared supine and sitting blood pressure measurements and first and second measurements (1 min apart) in each position to determine whether any differences seen might have implications for the routine measurement of blood pressure in these patients, as a group or as individuals. Measurements were made with the Copal UA-251 semi-automated sphygmomanometer. In the group there was no significant difference between the first and the second diastolic measurements. The first systolic measurement was on average 3-4 mmHg higher than the second in both positions. Mean supine systolic pressures were 2-3 mmHg higher and diastolic pressures 2-3 mmHg lower than the corresponding sitting pressures. In individual subjects there were substantial disagreements between successive measurements in both positions and between positions. However, these differences would not have influenced blood pressure management in more than a few instances. We suggest that two measurements should routinely be taken, and the average recorded, particularly when the average exceeds 155/90 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2168453     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199007000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  11 in total

1.  Polygenic approaches to detect gene-environment interactions when external information is unavailable.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lin; Ching-Chieh Huang; Yu-Li Liu; Shih-Jen Tsai; Po-Hsiu Kuo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  10.5 T MRI static field effects on human cognitive, vestibular, and physiological function.

Authors:  Andrea Grant; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Cheryl Olman; Lin Zhang; Joseph Koopermeiners; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Margaret Koeritzer; Meredith E Adams; Thomas R Henry; Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Normal variations in brain oxygen extraction fraction are partly attributed to differences in end-tidal CO2.

Authors:  Dengrong Jiang; Zixuan Lin; Peiying Liu; Sandeepa Sur; Cuimei Xu; Kaisha Hazel; George Pottanat; Sevil Yasar; Paul Rosenberg; Marilyn Albert; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Effect of supine versus sitting position on noninvasive assessment of aortic pressure waveform: a randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  D Vrachatis; T G Papaioannou; A Konstantopoulou; E G Nasothimiou; S Millasseau; J Blacher; M E Safar; P P Sfikakis; G S Stergiou; A D Protogerou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M B Schulze; A Kroke; M M Bergmann; H Boeing
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Salt, hypertension and renal disease: comparative medicine, models and real diseases.

Authors:  A R Michell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Sitting on the evidence: what is the proper patient position for the office measurement of blood pressure?

Authors:  Ari Mosenkis; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Päivikki Koponen; Androniki Naska; Satu Männistö; Grazyna Broda; Tarja Palosaari; Kari Kuulasmaa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Short-term blood pressure variability - variation between arm side, body position and successive measurements: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Elena Lacruz; Alexander Kluttig; Oliver Kuss; Daniel Tiller; Daniel Medenwald; Sebastian Nuding; Karin Halina Greiser; Stefan Frantz; Johannes Haerting
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.