Literature DB >> 21684509

Comparison of the relation between the calcium score and plaque characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome versus patients with stable coronary artery disease, assessed by computed tomography angiography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.

Joëlla E van Velzen1, Fleur R de Graaf, J Wouter Jukema, Greetje J de Grooth, Gabija Pundziute, Lucia J Kroft, Albert de Roos, Johan H C Reiber, Jeroen J Bax, Martin J Schalij, Joanne D Schuijf, Ernst E van der Wall.   

Abstract

A considerable number of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who present with a 0 or low calcium score (CS) still demonstrate coronary artery disease (CAD) and significant stenosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between the CS and the degree and character of atherosclerosis in patients with suspected ACS versus patients with stable CAD obtained by computed tomography angiography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH IVUS). Overall 112 patients were studied, 53 with ACS and 59 with stable CAD. Calcium scoring and computed tomography angiography were performed and followed by VH IVUS. On computed tomography angiography each segment was evaluated for plaque and classified as noncalcified, mixed, or calcified. Vulnerable plaque characteristics on VH IVUS were defined by percent necrotic core and presence of thin-cap fibroatheroma. If the CS was 0, patients with ACS had a higher mean number of plaques (5.0 ± 2.0 vs 2.0 ± 1.9, p <0.05) and noncalcified plaques (4.6 ± 3.5 vs 1.3 ± 1.9, p <0.05) on computed tomography angiography than those with stable CAD. If the CS was 0, VH IVUS demonstrated that patients with ACS had a larger amount of necrotic core area (0.58 ± 0.73 vs 0.22 ± 0.43 mm(2), p <0.05) and a higher mean number of thin-cap fibroatheromas (0.6 ± 0.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.3, p <0.05) than patients with stable CAD. In conclusion, even in the presence of a 0 CS, patients with ACS have increased plaque burden and increased vulnerability compared to patients with stable CAD. Therefore, absence of coronary calcification does not exclude the presence of clinically relevant and potentially vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque burden in patients with ACS.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684509     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of heart failure in the elderly: when, where and how to begin?

Authors:  Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  NaF uptake in unstable plaque: what does fluoride uptake mean?

Authors:  Takehiro Nakahara; Jagat Narula; H William Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Clinical significance of hepatic steatosis according to coronary plaque morphology: assessment using controlled attenuation parameter.

Authors:  Hyo Eun Park; Heesun Lee; Su-Yeon Choi; Min-Sun Kwak; Jong In Yang; Jeong Yoon Yim; Goh Eun Chung
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Influence of tube potential on quantitative coronary plaque analyses by low radiation dose computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Chunhong Wang; Yuliang Liao; Haibin Chen; Xin Zhen; Jianhong Li; Yikai Xu; Linghong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Neutrophil subsets and their gene signature associate with vascular inflammation and coronary atherosclerosis in lupus.

Authors:  Philip M Carlucci; Monica M Purmalek; Amit K Dey; Yenealem Temesgen-Oyelakin; Simantini Sakhardande; Aditya A Joshi; Joseph B Lerman; Alice Fike; Michael Davis; Jonathan H Chung; Martin P Playford; Mohammad Naqi; Pragnesh Mistry; Gustavo Gutierrez-Cruz; Stefania Dell'Orso; Faiza Naz; Taufiq Salahuddin; Balaji Natarajan; Zerai Manna; Wanxia L Tsai; Sarthak Gupta; Peter Grayson; Heather Teague; Marcus Y Chen; Hong-Wei Sun; Sarfaraz Hasni; Nehal N Mehta; Mariana J Kaplan
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-04-19

Review 6.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Comparison between drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents in very small coronary artery interventions.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsuan Tsai; Chih-Fan Yeh; Shih-Wei Meng; Chi-Sheng Hung; Mao-Shin Lin; Ching-Chang Huang; Chun-Kai Chen; Kuo-Ping Huang; Ying-Hsien Chen; Hsien-Li Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander R van Rosendael; Jagat Narula; Fay Y Lin; Inge J van den Hoogen; Umberto Gianni; Omar Al Hussein Alawamlh; Patricia C Dunham; Jessica M Peña; Sang-Eun Lee; Daniele Andreini; Filippo Cademartiri; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Edoardo Conte; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Fabian Plank; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Todd C Villines; Harald G Weirich; Subhi J Al'Aref; Lohendran Baskaran; Iksung Cho; Ibrahim Danad; Donghee Han; Ran Heo; Ji Hyun Lee; Asim Rivzi; Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Heidi Gransar; Yao Lu; Ji Min Sung; Hyung-Bok Park; Habib Samady; Peter H Stone; Renu Virmani; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Jeroen J Bax; James K Min; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 9.  Current understanding of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yue Zhang; Cheuk-Man Yu; Qing-Wei Ji; Meng Cai; Ying-Xin Zhao; Yu-Jie Zhou
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  A score to quantify coronary plaque vulnerability in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Mathias Burgmaier; Martin Hellmich; Nikolaus Marx; Sebastian Reith
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.