Literature DB >> 21684227

Predictive model for bacteremia in adult patients with blood cultures performed at the emergency department: a preliminary report.

Chan-Ping Su1, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Shey-Ying Chen, Wen-Chu Ghiang, Grace Hwei-Min Wu, Hsin-Yun Sun, Chien-Cheng Lee, Jiun-Ling Wang, Shan-Chwen Chang, Yee-Chun Chen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Wen-Jone Chen, Po-Ren Hsueh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Useful predictive models for identifying patients at high risk of bacteremia at the emergency department (ED) are lacking. This study attempted to provide useful predictive models for identifying patients at high risk of bacteremia at the ED.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the ED of a tertiary care hospital from October 1 to November 30, 2004. Patients aged 15 years or older, who had at least two sets of blood culture, were recruited. Data were analyzed on selected covariates, including demographic characteristics, predisposing conditions, clinical presentations, laboratory tests, and presumptive diagnosis, at the ED. An iterative procedure was used to build up a logistic model, which was then simplified into a coefficient-based scoring system.
RESULTS: A total of 558 patients with 84 episodes of true bacteremia were enrolled. Predictors of bacteremia and their assigned scores were as follows: fever greater than or equal to 38.3°C [odds ratio (OR), 2.64], 1 point; tachycardia greater than or equal to 120/min (OR, 2.521), 1 point; lymphopenia less than 0.5×10(3)/μL (OR, 3.356), 2 points; aspartate transaminase greater than 40IU/L (OR, 2.355), 1 point; C-reactive protein greater than 10mg/dL (OR, 2.226), 1 point; procalcitonin greater than 0.5 ng/mL (OR, 3.147), 2 points; and presumptive diagnosis of respiratory tract infection (OR, 0.236), -2 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the original logistic model and the simplified scoring model using the aforementioned seven predictors and their assigned scores were 0.854 (95% confidence interval, 0.806-0.902) and 0.845 (95% confidence interval, 0.798-0.894), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This simplified scoring system could rapidly identify high-risk patients of bacteremia at the ED.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684227     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect        ISSN: 1684-1182            Impact factor:   4.399


  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic challenges and opportunities in older adults with infectious diseases.

Authors:  David van Duin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Predictive factors of bacteremia in patients with febrile urinary tract infection: an experience at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  H Lee; Y-S Lee; R Jeong; Y-J Kim; S Ahn
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  A bacteraemia risk prediction model: development and validation in an emergency medicine population.

Authors:  Agustín Julián-Jiménez; Juan González Del Castillo; Eric Jorge García-Lamberechts; Itziar Huarte Sanz; Carmen Navarro Bustos; Rafael Rubio Díaz; Josep María Guardiola Tey; Ferrán Llopis-Roca; Pascual Piñera Salmerón; Mikel de Martín-Ortiz de Zarate; Jesús Álvarez-Manzanares; Julio Javier Gamazo-Del Rio; Marta Álvarez Alonso; Begoña Mora Ordoñez; Oscar Álvarez López; María Del Mar Ortega Romero; María Del Mar Sousa Reviriego; Ramón Perales Pardo; Henrique Villena García Del Real; María José Marchena González; José María Ferreras Amez; Félix González Martínez; Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez; Pedro Beneyto Martín; Francisco Javier Candel González; Antonio Jesús Díaz-Honrubia
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  The predictive role of Interleukin 6 in burn patients with positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Jochen Gille; Jovan Jocovic; Thomas Kremer; Armin Sablotzki
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Blood cultures taken from patients attending emergency departments in South Africa are an important antibiotic stewardship tool, which directly influences patient management.

Authors:  Tom H Boyles; Kelly Davis; Thomas Crede; Jacques Malan; Marc Mendelson; Maia Lesosky
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Evaluation of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 & serum amyloid A as diagnostic biomarkers of bacterial infection in febrile patients.

Authors:  Junyan Qu; Xiaoju L; Yanbin Liu; Xiaohui Wang
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Franz Ratzinger; Michel Dedeyan; Matthias Rammerstorfer; Thomas Perkmann; Heinz Burgmann; Athanasios Makristathis; Georg Dorffner; Felix Lötsch; Alexander Blacky; Michael Ramharter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Don't miss the diagnosis of sepsis!

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Identifying Patients with Bacteremia in Community-Hospital Emergency Rooms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Taro Takeshima; Yosuke Yamamoto; Yoshinori Noguchi; Nobuyuki Maki; Koichiro Gibo; Yukio Tsugihashi; Asako Doi; Shingo Fukuma; Shin Yamazaki; Eiji Kajii; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Risk of bacteremia in patients presenting with shaking chills and vomiting - a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  M Holmqvist; M Inghammar; L I Påhlman; J Boyd; P Åkesson; A Linder; F Kahn
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.