Literature DB >> 34094705

The predictive role of Interleukin 6 in burn patients with positive blood cultures.

Jochen Gille1, Jovan Jocovic1, Thomas Kremer2, Armin Sablotzki1.   

Abstract

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is an established biomarker of inflammation with one of the earliest responses in sepsis. Serum levels can easily be measured within a few hours. The clinical significance of IL-6 in the early stage of sepsis in burned patients has not yet been confirmed. The purpose of our research was to investigate the predictive value of IL-6 for positive blood cultures in comparison to Procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell (WBC) count, body temperature and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the presence of suspected sepsis in burn patients. In a retrospective study, we included all patients admitted to a regional burn centre in a 7-year period. Patients with a clinical suspicion of sepsis and complete laboratory tests underwent further analysis. Patients were categorized following culture results into either positive or negative bloodstream infection (BSI or non-BSI) groups. 39 of the 101 included patients had positive blood cultures (BSI). The serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the BSI group [1047 (339.9; 9000.5) vs. 198.5 (112.4; 702.5) ng/l; P = 0.001]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.7 (59; 80.8%). The optimal IL-6 cut-off level was 312.8 ng/l (sensitivity 79.5%, specificity 56.5%). Other biomarkers (PCT, WBC), the maximum body temperature and increase of SOFA score were not different between the groups. IL-6 can be used to predict a positive blood culture even in the early stage of suspected sepsis in burned patients. In this context, other biomarkers (PCT, WBC) and body temperature are of limited clinical utility. IJBT
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burn injury; IL-6; PCT; blood stream infection; sepsis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34094705      PMCID: PMC8166662     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma        ISSN: 2160-2026


  24 in total

1.  Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria elicit different patterns of pro-inflammatory cytokines in human monocytes.

Authors:  Christina C Hessle; Bengt Andersson; Agnes E Wold
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.861

2.  Defining Sepsis in Burn Patients: Still a Long Way to Go.

Authors:  David G Greenhalgh
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  Inflammatory markers in patients with severe burn injury. What is the best indicator of sepsis?

Authors:  Athina Lavrentieva; Theodore Kontakiotis; Lambis Lazaridis; Nikolaos Tsotsolis; John Koumis; George Kyriazis; Militsa Bitzani
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns.

Authors:  David G Greenhalgh; Jeffrey R Saffle; James H Holmes; Richard L Gamelli; Tina L Palmieri; Jureta W Horton; Ronald G Tompkins; Daniel L Traber; David W Mozingo; Edwin A Deitch; Cleon W Goodwin; David N Herndon; James J Gallagher; Art P Sanford; James C Jeng; David H Ahrenholz; Alice N Neely; Michael S O'Mara; Steven E Wolf; Gary F Purdue; Warren L Garner; Charles J Yowler; Barbara A Latenser
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Can we use C-reactive protein levels to predict severe infection or sepsis in severely burned patients?

Authors:  Marc G Jeschke; Celeste C Finnerty; Gabriela A Kulp; Robert Kraft; David N Herndon
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-07-08

6.  Clinical Significance of Interleukin-6 in the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Discriminating Sepsis Induced by Gram-negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Wen-Xia Shao; Dao-Jun Yu; Wei-Ying Zhang; Xian-Jun Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A validation of current sepsis scores.

Authors:  Jinhui Yan; William F Hill; Sarah Rehou; Ruxandra Pinto; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Evaluation of white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, and elevated temperature as predictors of bloodstream infection in burn patients.

Authors:  Clinton K Murray; Roselle M Hoffmaster; David R Schmit; Duane R Hospenthal; John A Ward; Leopoldo C Cancio; Steven E Wolf
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-07

9.  Predicting and managing sepsis in burn patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Omar Nunez Lopez; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Ludwik K Branski; William B Norbury; David N Herndon
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Checking procalcitonin suitability for prognosis and antimicrobial therapy monitoring in burn patients.

Authors:  Luís Cabral; Vera Afreixo; Rita Meireles; Miguel Vaz; Catarina Chaves; Marisa Caetano; Luís Almeida; José Artur Paiva
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-03-31
View more
  3 in total

1.  EVALUATING SEPSIS CRITERIA IN DETECTING ALTERATIONS IN CLINICAL, METABOLIC, AND INFLAMMATORY PARAMETERS IN BURN PATIENTS.

Authors:  Carly M Knuth; Sarah Rehou; Dalia Barayan; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Paper-Based Interleukin-6 Test Strip for Early Detection of Wound Infection.

Authors:  Shin-Chen Pan; Yu-Feng Wu; Yu-Chen Lin; Sheng-Wen Lin; Chao-Min Cheng
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-03

Review 3.  Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock.

Authors:  Dorothee Boehm; Henrik Menke
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.