Literature DB >> 21680973

Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: a national study.

Nancy Shore1, Elaine Drew, Ruta Brazauskas, Sarena D Seifer.   

Abstract

Community groups are implementing research ethics review processes to determine whether and how research is conducted in their communities. We report on a survey of 109 of these community-based review processes about their relationships with institution based research ethics boards (I-REBs). Ninety-two percent reported that studies they review were also reviewed by an I-REB. Over half characterized their relationship with I-REBs positively. Those with positive relationships were significantly more likely to communicate with the involved I-REBs. Challenges when working with I-REBs included delays, communication problems, and lack of I-REB understanding of community-based participatory research. Strengthening relationships between community-based review processes and I-REBs could ultimately enhance reviews of community-engaged research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680973     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  7 in total

1.  Community-Based Review of Research Across Diverse Community Contexts: Key Characteristics, Critical Issues, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nancy Shore; Angela Ford; Eric Wat; Missy Brayboy; Mei-Ling Isaacs; Alice Park; Hal Strelnick; Sarena D Seifer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Alaska Native Health Research Forum: Perspectives on disseminating research findings.

Authors:  Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julie A Beans; Lisa G Dirks; Jaedon P Avey; Karen Caindec; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res       Date:  2018

3.  Convergence Despite Divergence: Views of Academic and Community Stakeholders about the Ethics of Community-Engaged Research.

Authors:  Stephanie M Hoover; Shristi Tiwari; Jimin Kim; Melissa Green; Al Richmond; Mysha Wynn; Kyle Simone Nisbeth; Stuart Rennie; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 5.  Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review.

Authors:  Lisa Mikesell; Elizabeth Bromley; Dmitry Khodyakov
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Research ethics and indigenous communities.

Authors:  Allyson Kelley; Annie Belcourt-Dittloff; Cheryl Belcourt; Gordon Belcourt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  [Participatory health research: origins and current trends].

Authors:  Michael T Wright
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 1.513

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.