Literature DB >> 21679995

Patient preoperative expectations of urinary, bowel, hormonal and sexual functioning do not match actual outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy.

Daniela Wittmann1, Chang He, Michael Coelho, Brent Hollenbeck, James E Montie, David P Wood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied patient expectations of post-prostatectomy recovery from urinary incontinence, and urinary irritable, hormonal, bowel and sexual function symptoms after preoperative counseling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, recruited between June 2007 and November 2008, were extensively counseled preoperatively regarding expected outcomes. They were assessed at baseline and 1 year after surgery using the short form of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite. Their baseline expectations of functional outcomes 1 year after surgery were assessed using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite-Expectations. Pearson's correlation coefficient and a multiple linear regression were used to assess the associations between Expanded Prostate Index Composite-Expectations and Expanded Prostate Index Composite-Short Form at baseline and 1 year.
RESULTS: A total of 152 consenting patients completed all questionnaires. Baseline sexual function score predicted significantly expectations of sexual function (p<0.0001) and urinary incontinence (p<0.0001) scores. Expanded Prostate Index Composite-Expectations predicted Expanded Prostate Index Composite-sexual function at 1 year (p<0.0001). Of the patients 36% and 40% expected the same as baseline function at 1 year in urinary incontinence and sexual function, respectively, and 17%, 45%, 39%, 15% and 32% expected worse than baseline function at 1 year in urinary incontinence, urinary irritable symptoms, bowel function, hormonal function and sexual function, respectively. One year after prostatectomy fewer than 22% of patients attained lower than expected urinary irritable symptoms, and bowel and hormonal function. However, 47% and 44% of patients attained lower than expected function for urinary incontinence and sexual function, respectively. Surprisingly 12% and 17% of patients expected better than baseline urinary incontinence and sexual function at 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Men have unrealistic expectations of urinary and sexual function after prostatectomy despite preoperative counseling. We hypothesize potentially responsible psychological mechanisms. These data provide a baseline for further preoperative educational interventions.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679995     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Symptom management strategies for men with early-stage prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Patient Education Program (PC PEP).

Authors:  Alok Vij; Marc A Kowalkowski; Tae Hart; Heather Honoré Goltz; David J Hoffman; Sara J Knight; Peter R Caroll; David M Latini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples' sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Laurel Northouse; Heather Crossley; David Miller; Rodney Dunn; Jennifer Nidetz; Jeanne Montie; Mia Moyad; Katie Lavin; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2014-01-09

Review 3.  Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker; Richard J Wassersug; John W Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  [Treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review of interactive, personalized patient decision aids].

Authors:  C Groeben; J C Streuli; T Krones; B Keck; M P Wirth; J Huber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Canadian consensus algorithm for erectile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Dean S Elterman; Anika R Petrella; Lauren M Walker; Brandon Van Asseldonk; Leah Jamnicky; Gerald B Brock; Stacy Elliott; Antonio Finelli; Jerzy B Gajewski; Keith A Jarvi; John Robinson; Janet Ellis; Shaun Shepherd; Hossein Saadat; Andrew Matthew
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Heather Crossley; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; Patricia Clark; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Optimizing postoperative sexual function after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Manuela Tutolo; Alberto Briganti; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Marco Bianchi; Niccolò Passoni; Alessandro Nini; Nicola Fossati; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-12

8.  Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret.

Authors:  J J Aning; R J Wassersug; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Prostate cancer: care beyond prostate cancer-improving patient outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Patient Participation in Communication about Treatment Decision-Making for Localized Prostate Cancer during Consultation Visits.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Mark P Toles; Jinbing Bai; Matthew E Nielsen; Donald E Bailey; Betsy Sleath; Barbara Mark
Journal:  Health N Hav       Date:  2015-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.