Literature DB >> 21679851

Clinical strategies and outcomes in advanced heart failure patients older than 70 years of age receiving the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: a community hospital experience.

Robert M Adamson1, Marcia Stahovich, Suzanne Chillcott, Sam Baradarian, Joseph Chammas, Brian Jaski, Peter Hoagland, Walter Dembitsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine outcomes in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients older than age 70 years.
BACKGROUND: Food and Drug Administration approval of the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, California) LVAD for destination therapy has provided an attractive option for older patients with advanced heart failure.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients received the HeartMate II LVAD between October 5, 2005, and January 1, 2010, as part of either the bridge to transplantation or destination therapy trials at a community hospital. Patients were divided into 2 age groups: ≥ 70 years of age (n = 30) and < 70 years of age (n = 25). Outcome measures including survival, length of hospital stay, adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Pre-operatively, all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class IV refractory to maximal medical therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival for patients ≥ 70 years of age (97% at 1 month, 75% at 1 year, and 70% at 2 years) was not statistically different from patients <7 0 years of age (96% 1 month, 72% at 1 year, and 65% at 2 years, p = 0.806). Average length of hospital stay for the ≥ 70-year age group was 24 ± 15 days, similar to that of the < 70-year age group (23 ± 14 days, p = 0.805). There were no differences in the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups. Quality of life and functional status improved significantly in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The LVAD patients ≥ 70 years of age have good functional recovery, survival, and quality of life at 2 years. Advanced age should not be used as an independent contraindication when selecting a patient for LVAD therapy at experienced centers.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679851     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support for elderly heart failure patients.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 3.  Frailty and the selection of patients for destination therapy left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kelsey M Flint; Daniel D Matlock; Joann Lindenfeld; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 4.  INTERMACS and MedaMACS: how will they guide future therapy?

Authors:  Garrick C Stewart; Lynne W Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Comparison of outcomes after heart replacement therapy in patients over 65 years old.

Authors:  Robert A Sorabella; Halit Yerebakan; Ryan Walters; Koji Takeda; Paolo Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Ulrich Jorde; Donna Mancini; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Functional status in left ventricular assist device-supported patients: a literature review.

Authors:  Martha Abshire; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb; Stuart D Russell
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Age and gender differences and factors related to change in health-related quality of life from before to 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation: Findings from Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Annetine Gelijins; Alan Moskowitz; Francis D Pagani; James B Young; John A Spertus; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Ventricular assist device implant in the elderly is associated with increased, but respectable risk: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Pavan Atluri; Andrew B Goldstone; Dale M Kobrin; Jeffrey E Cohen; John W MacArthur; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; J Eduardo Rame; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  A review of ethical considerations for ventricular assist device placement in older adults.

Authors:  Courtenay R Bruce
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.745

10.  Septuagenarians bridged to heart transplantation with a ventricular assist device have outcomes similar to younger patients.

Authors:  Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Claude A Beaty; John V Conte; Kaushik Mandal; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.