Literature DB >> 21677856

Complete genome sequence of Bacteroides salanitronis type strain (BL78).

Sabine Gronow, Brittany Held, Susan Lucas, Alla Lapidus, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Hope Tice, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amrita Pati, Roxane Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, John C Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Jonathan A Eisen.   

Abstract

Bacteroides salanitronis Lan et al. 2006 is a species of the genus Bacteroides, which belongs to the family Bacteroidaceae. The species is of interest because it was isolated from the gut of a chicken and the growing awareness that the anaerobic microflora of the cecum is of benefit for the host and may impact poultry farming. The 4,308,663 bp long genome consists of a 4.24 Mbp chromosome and three plasmids (6 kbp, 19 kbp, 40 kbp) containing 3,737 protein-coding and 101 RNA genes and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteroidaceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; cecum; chemoorganotrophic; mesophilic; non-motile; poultry; rod-shaped; strictly anaerobic

Year:  2011        PMID: 21677856      PMCID: PMC3111984          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1704212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain BL78T (= DSM 18170 = CCUG 54637 = JCM 13657) is the type strain of Bacteroides salanitronis which belongs to the large genus Bacteroides [1,2]. Currently, there are 88 species placed in the genus Bacteroides. The species epithet is derived from the name of Joseph P. Salanitro, an American microbiologist. B. salanitronis strain BL78T was isolated among other Bacteroides strains from the cecum of a healthy chicken. No other strain belonging to the same species has been identified [2]. Many Bacteroides species are common inhabitants of the intestine where they help to degrade complex molecules such as polysaccharides or transform steroids [3,4]. They also play a role as beneficent protectors of the gut against pathogenic microorganisms [5]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. salanitronis BL78T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain BL78T was compared using NCBI BLAST under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [6] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [7]) were determined. The single most frequent genus was Bacteroides (100.0%) (1 hit in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 96.2%. No hits to sequences with (other) species names were found. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was DQ456041 ('pre-adolescent turkey cecum clone CFT112F11'), which showed an identity of 96.8% and an HSP coverage of 63.9%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'fecal' (9.3%), 'microbiota' (7.5%), 'human' (7.1%), 'antibiot, effect, gut, pervas' (7.1%) and 'anim, beef, cattl, coli, escherichia, feedlot, habitat, synecolog' (2.2%) (249 hits in total). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of B. salanitronis in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the six 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to 26 nucleotides, and differ by up to 26 nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB253731).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of B. salanitronis relative to a selection of other type strains within the genus. The tree was inferred from 1,412 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers to the right of bifurcations are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] but unpublished are labeled with one asterisk, published genomes with two asterisks [13-15].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of B. salanitronis relative to a selection of other type strains within the genus. The tree was inferred from 1,412 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers to the right of bifurcations are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] but unpublished are labeled with one asterisk, published genomes with two asterisks [13-15]. The cells of B. salanitronis are generally rod-shaped (0.4-0.7 × 0.8-5.6 µm) with rounded ends (Figure 2). The cells are usually arranged singly or in pairs [2]. B. salanitronis is a Gram-negative, non-spore-forming bacterium (Table 1) that is described as non-motile, with only five genes associated with motility having been found in the genome (see below). The temperature optimum for strain BL78T is 37°C. B. salanitronis is a strictly anaerobic chemoorganotroph and is able to ferment glucose, mannose, sucrose, maltose, arabinose, cellobiose, lactose, xylose and raffinose [2]. The organism hydrolyzes esculin but does not liquefy gelatin, and neither reduces nitrate nor produces indole from tryptophan [2]. B. salanitronis does not utilize trehalose, glycerol, mannitol, sorbitol or melezitose; rhamnose and salicin are fermented weakly [2]. Growth is possible in the presence of bile [2]. Major fermentation products from broth (1% peptone, 1% yeast extract, and 1% glucose each (w/v)) are acetic acid and succinic acid, whereas isovaleric acid is produced in small amounts [2]. B. salanitronis shows activity for alkaline phosphatase, α- and β-galactosidases, α- and β-glucosidases, α-arabinosidase, leucyl glycine arylamidase, alanine arylamidase and glutamyl glutamic acid arylamidase but no activity for urease, catalase, glutamic acid decarboxylase, arginine dihydrolase, β-galactosidase 6-phosphate, β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-fucosidase and arginine, proline, leucine, phenylalanine, pyroglutamic acid, tyrosine, glycine, histidine and serine arylamidase [2].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B. salanitronis BL78T

Table 1

Classification and general features of B. salanitronis BL78T according to the MIGS recommendations [16].

MIGS ID   Property    Term    Evidence code
   Current classification    Domain Bacteria    TAS [17]
    Phylum 'Bacteroidetes'    TAS [18]
    Class 'Bacteroidia'    TAS [19]
    Order 'Bacteroidales'    TAS [20]
    Family Bacteroidaceae    TAS [21,22]
    Genus Bacteroides    TAS [21,23-26]
    Species Bacteroides salanitronis    TAS [2]
    Type strain BL78    TAS [2]
   Gram stain    negative    TAS [2]
   Cell shape    rod-shaped    TAS [2]
   Motility    non-motile    TAS [2]
   Sporulation    none    TAS [2]
   Temperature range    mesophile    TAS [2]
   Optimum temperature    37°C    TAS [2]
   Salinity    normal    NAS
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement    strictly anaerobic    TAS [2]
   Carbon source    carbohydrates    TAS [2]
   Energy metabolism    chemoorganotroph    TAS [2]
MIGS-6   Habitat    chicken    TAS [2]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship    free-living    NAS
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity    none    NAS
   Biosafety level    1    TAS [27]
   Isolation    chicken cecum    TAS [2]
MIGS-4   Geographic location    Japan    TAS [2]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time    November 2005    IDA
MIGS-4.1   Latitude    not reported
MIGS-4.2   Longitude    not reported
MIGS-4.3   Depth    not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude    not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [28]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of B. salanitronis BL78T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [28]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

B. salanitronis strain BL78T contains menaquinones MK-11 and MK-12 as principal respiratory quinones (43% each), small amounts of MK-10 (5%) and MK-13 (7%) are found as minor components [2]. The major fatty acids found were anteiso-C15:0 (32%), iso-C15:0 (14%), 3-hydroxy C16:0 (12%) and 3-hydroxy iso-C17:0 (10%). Fatty acids C14:0 (4%), C15:0 (2%), C16:0 (8%), C18:1 (2%), C18:2 (2%) and iso-C14:0 (2%) were found in minor amounts [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [29], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [30]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [31] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used   Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,   one 454 PE library (7 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   283.0 × Illumina; 37.7 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-09-14-2009-bin, Velvet, phrap version SPS 4.24
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID   CP002530 (chromosome)   CP002531 (plasmid 1)   CP002532 (plasmid 2)   CP002533 (plasmid 3)
   Genbank Date of Release   February 28, 2011
   GOLD ID   Gc001665
   NCBI project ID   40066
   Database: IMG-GEBA   2503754023
MIGS-13   Source material identifier   DSM 18170
   Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. salanitronis BL78T, DSM 18170, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 104 (Peptone-Yeast extract-Glucose broth) [32] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, adding 20 µL lysozyme (100mg/µl), and 10 µL mutanolysin, achromopeptidase, and lysostaphine, each, for 40 min lysis at 37ºC followed by one hour incubation on ice. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [33].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [34]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3-PreRelease-09-14-2009-bin (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 100 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap assembly [35] by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired-end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (920.8 Mb) was assembled with Velvet, version 0.7.63 [36] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 109.0 Mb of 454 standard data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [35] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [34], Dupfinisher [37], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 193 additional reactions and four shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [38]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 320.7 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 393,135 pyrosequence and 25,576,764 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [39] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [40]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [41].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 4,242,803 bp long chromosome with a G+C content of 47%, as well as three plasmids of 6,277 bp, 18,280 bp and 40,303 bp length (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,838 genes predicted, 3,737 were protein-coding genes, and 101 RNAs; 96 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (57.3%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value  % of Total
Genome size (bp)   4,308,663  100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)   3,759,354  87.25%
DNA G+C content (bp)   2,003,128  46.49%
Number of replicons   4
Extrachromosomal elements   3
Total genes   3,838  100.00%
RNA genes   101  2.63%
rRNA operons   6
Protein-coding genes   3,737  97.37%
Pseudo genes   96  2.50%
Genes with function prediction   2,200  57.32%
Genes in paralog clusters   876  22.82%
Genes assigned to COGs   2,013  52.45%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   2,269  59.12%
Genes with signal peptides   918  23.92%
Genes with transmembrane helices   794  20.69%
CRISPR repeats   0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome (plasmid maps not shown). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value  %age   Description
J   147  6.8   Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0  0.0   RNA processing and modification
K   143  6.6   Transcription
L   194  9.0   Replication, recombination and repair
B   0  0.0   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   31  1.4   Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0  0.0   Nuclear structure
V   63  2.9   Defense mechanisms
T   85  3.9   Signal transduction mechanisms
M   193  8.9   Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   5  0.2   Cell motility
Z   0  0.0   Cytoskeleton
W   0  0.0   Extracellular structures
U   61  2.8   Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   61  2.8   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   105  4.9   Energy production and conversion
G   174  8.0   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   134  6.2   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   68  3.1   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   98  4.5   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   62  2.9   Lipid transport and metabolism
P   104  4.8   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   29  1.3   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   285  13.2   General function prediction only
S   125  5.8   Function unknown
-   1,825  47.6   Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome (plasmid maps not shown). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  22 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  A genomic view of the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Magnus K Bjursell; Jason Himrod; Su Deng; Lynn K Carmichael; Herbert C Chiang; Lora V Hooper; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 6.  Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine.

Authors:  Fredrik Bäckhed; Ruth E Ley; Justin L Sonnenburg; Daniel A Peterson; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia N Ivanova; I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The DNA bank network: the start from a german initiative.

Authors:  Birgit Gemeinholzer; Gabriele Dröge; Holger Zetzsche; Gerhard Haszprunar; Hans-Peter Klenk; Anton Güntsch; Walter G Berendsohn; Johann-Wolfgang Wägele
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.

Authors:  Doug Hyatt; Gwo-Liang Chen; Philip F Locascio; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Loren J Hauser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Autoreactive T cells specific for insulin B:11-23 recognize a low-affinity peptide register in human subjects with autoimmune diabetes.

Authors:  Junbao Yang; I-Ting Chow; Tomasz Sosinowski; Nadia Torres-Chinn; Carla J Greenbaum; Eddie A James; John W Kappler; Howard W Davidson; William W Kwok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Discovery of β-1,4-D-mannosyl-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine phosphorylase involved in the metabolism of N-glycans.

Authors:  Takanori Nihira; Erika Suzuki; Motomitsu Kitaoka; Mamoru Nishimoto; Ken'ichi Ohtsubo; Hiroyuki Nakai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Non-contiguous finished genome sequence of Bacteroides coprosuis type strain (PC139).

Authors:  Miriam Land; Brittany Held; Sabine Gronow; Birte Abt; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Loren Hauser; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-04-29

4.  Comparative genomics of transport proteins in seven Bacteroides species.

Authors:  Hassan Zafar; Milton H Saier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Specific Microbial Taxa and Functional Capacity Contribute to Chicken Abdominal Fat Deposition.

Authors:  Hai Xiang; Jiankang Gan; Daoshu Zeng; Jing Li; Hui Yu; Haiquan Zhao; Ying Yang; Shuwen Tan; Gen Li; Chaowei Luo; Zhuojun Xie; Guiping Zhao; Hua Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Semi-automatic in silico gap closure enabled de novo assembly of two Dehalobacter genomes from metagenomic data.

Authors:  Shuiquan Tang; Yunchen Gong; Elizabeth A Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.