Literature DB >> 21677473

The changing role of pathology in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Anthony S-Y Leong1, Zhengping Zhuang.   

Abstract

Pathological examination has been the gold standard for diagnosis in cancer and its role has also included the elucidation of etiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological correlation, and prognostication. The advent of newer technologies and the realization that breast cancer is heterogeneous has shifted the focus to prognostication, with increased attention being paid to the identification of morphological features and immunohistochemical markers of prognostic relevance. However, despite the massive efforts invested in the identification of immunohistochemical biomarkers in breast cancer the majority have not proven to be of value in multivariate analyses and only estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2/neu expression have remained essential components of pathological examination. These 3 markers were initially employed for prognostication but their role in treatment also rendered them of predictive value. Newer molecular methods, especially high-throughput technologies, have shown that even morphologically similar subtypes of breast cancer can show molecular heterogeneity; moreover, infiltrating ductal carcinoma can be separated into at least 4 molecular subtypes designated luminal (ER+, PR+, and Her2/neu-), Her2 overexpressing (ER-, PR-, and Her2/neu+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, Her2/neu-, and CK5/6+, EGFR+), and normal breast-like (ER-, PR-, and Her2/neu-), each with different clinical outcomes. The importance of proliferative gene expression in these subtypes has been demonstrated and surrogate immunohistochemical markers include ER, PR, Her2/neu, and Ki67 for the more expensive molecular tests. Molecular technologies, importantly, have not only provided further insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer but have also opened new avenues for treatment through the identification of signaling molecules important in the proliferation and survival of the neoplastic cells. The treatment of cancer thus shifts from the conventional approach of 'one size fits all' to one of personalized treatment tailored to the specific characteristics of the tumor. Pathologists continue to play their traditional role in diagnosis but, as purveyors of the excised tissue, pathologists now have the additional role of identifying biomarkers responsive to therapeutic manipulation, thus playing an inextricable role as diagnostic oncologists in the management of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21677473      PMCID: PMC3128144          DOI: 10.1159/000292644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathobiology        ISSN: 1015-2008            Impact factor:   4.342


  162 in total

1.  Imaging mass spectrometry: a new technology for the analysis of protein expression in mammalian tissues.

Authors:  M Stoeckli; P Chaurand; D E Hallahan; R M Caprioli
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Discovering novel chemotherapeutic drugs for the third millennium.

Authors:  M D Garrett; P Workman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Quality assurance for detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry in Austrian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Peter Regitnig; Angelika Reiner; Hans-Peter Dinges; Gerald Höfler; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Sigurd F Lax; Peter Obrist; Margaretha Rudas; Franz Quehenberger
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Protein microarrays: meeting analytical challenges for clinical applications.

Authors:  Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina; Arpita I Mehta; Valerie Calvert; Kevin Rosenblatt; David Geho; Peter J Munson; Lynn Young; Julia Wulfkuhle; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  An optimized protein in-gel digest method for reliable proteome characterization by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis.

Authors:  P Kumarathasan; S Mohottalage; P Goegan; R Vincent
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.

Authors:  S Solinas-Toldo; S Lampel; S Stilgenbauer; J Nickolenko; A Benner; H Döhner; T Cremer; P Lichter
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Cancer and genomics.

Authors:  P A Futreal; A Kasprzyk; E Birney; J C Mullikin; R Wooster; M R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  The Her-2/neu gene and protein in breast cancer 2003: biomarker and target of therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; Jonathan A Fletcher; Gerald P Linette; James Stec; Edward Clark; Mark Ayers; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai; Kenneth J Bloom
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2003

10.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Nicholas Bertos; Francois Pepin; Svetlana Sadekova; Margarita Souleimanova; Hong Zhao; Haiying Chen; Gulbeyaz Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  27 in total

1.  A Brief History of Breast Cancer: Part II - Evolution of surgical pathology.

Authors:  Ritu Lakhtakia; Roshan F Chinoy
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-07-24

2.  Evaluation of BrightGen HR RT-qDx assay to detect nuclear receptors mRNA overexpression in FFPE breast cancer tissue samples for selection of tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  Hye-Young Wang; Sangjung Park; Sunghyun Kim; Sungwoo Ahn; Dongsup Lee; Seungil Kim; Dongju Jung; Kwang Hwa Park; Hyeyoung Lee
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  The ever-evolving role of pathologists in the management of breast cancer with neoadjuvant treatment: recommendations based on the Spanish clinical experience.

Authors:  O Burgués; Mª Á López-García; B Pérez-Míes; P Santiago; B Vieites; J F García; V Peg
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Mechanobiology of tumor invasion: engineering meets oncology.

Authors:  Shawn P Carey; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Sandra J Shin; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Host response in tumor diagnosis and prognosis: importance of immunologists and pathologists alliance.

Authors:  Olivera J Finn
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.362

6.  Sequential binary gene ratio tests define a novel molecular diagnostic strategy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Assunta De Rienzo; William G Richards; Beow Y Yeap; Melissa H Coleman; Peter E Sugarbaker; Lucian R Chirieac; Yaoyu E Wang; John Quackenbush; Roderick V Jensen; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Prognostic and predictive parameters in breast pathology: a pathologist's primer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  (1S,2E,4S,7E,11E)-2,7,11-Cembratriene-4,6-diol semisynthetic analogs as novel c-Met inhibitors for the control of c-Met-dependent breast malignancies.

Authors:  Hassan Y Ebrahim; Mohamed M Mohyeldin; Mohammad M Hailat; Khalid A El Sayed
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Morris; Stephen A Feig; Madeline Drexler; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Therapeutic nanosystems for oncology nanomedicine.

Authors:  A S Gonçalves; A S Macedo; E B Souto
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.