Literature DB >> 21676932

Representation of comparison signals in cortical area MT during a delayed direction discrimination task.

Leo L Lui1, Tatiana Pasternak.   

Abstract

Visually guided behavior often involves decisions that are based on evaluating stimuli in the context of those observed previously. Such decisions are made by monkeys comparing two consecutive stimuli, sample and test, moving in the same or opposite directions. We examined whether responses in the motion processing area MT during the comparison phase of this task (test) are modulated by the direction of the preceding stimulus (sample). This modulation, termed comparison signal, was measured by comparing responses to identical test stimuli on trials when it was preceded by sample moving in the same direction (S-trials) with trials when it was preceded by sample moving in a different direction (D-trials). The test always appeared in the neuron's receptive field (RF), whereas sample could appear in the RF or in the contralateral visual field (remote sample). With sample in-RF, we found three types of modulation carried by different sets of neurons: early suppression on S-trials and late enhancement, one on S-trials, and the other on D-trials. Under these conditions, many neurons with and without comparison effects exhibited significant, choice-related activity. Response modulation was also present following the remote sample, even though the information about its direction could only reach MT indirectly via top-down influences. However, unlike on trials with in-RF sample, these signals were dominated by response suppression, shedding light on the contribution of top-down influences to the comparison effects. These results demonstrate that during the task requiring monkeys to compare two directions of motion, MT responses during the comparison phase of this task reflect similarities and differences between the two stimuli, suggesting participation in sensory comparisons. The nature of these signals provides insights into the operation of bottom-up and top-down influences involved in this process.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21676932      PMCID: PMC3174806          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00016.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Motion adaptation in area MT.

Authors:  Richard J A Van Wezel; Kenneth H Britten
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization.

Authors:  David J Freedman; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Tomaso Poggio; Earl K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Julio C Martinez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Cortical connections of MT in four species of primates: areal, modular, and retinotopic patterns.

Authors:  L A Krubitzer; J H Kaas
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Same or different? A neural circuit mechanism of similarity-based pattern match decision making.

Authors:  Tatiana A Engel; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties.

Authors:  C L Colby; J R Duhamel; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; D C van Essen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Daniel Zaksas; Jason A Droll; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. I. the role of input and intrinsic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Mark M Churchland; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  19 in total

1.  Dynamics of the functional link between area MT LFPs and motion detection.

Authors:  Jackson E T Smith; Vincent Beliveau; Alan Schoen; Jordana Remz; Chang'an A Zhan; Erik P Cook
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Unilateral prefrontal lesions impair memory-guided comparisons of contralateral visual motion.

Authors:  Tatiana Pasternak; Leo L Lui; Philip M Spinelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rule Encoding in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Striatum Guides Selection.

Authors:  Brianna J Sleezer; Meghan D Castagno; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Task contingencies and perceptual strategies shape behavioral effects on neuronal response profiles.

Authors:  Nobuya Sato; William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Prefrontal Neurons Represent Motion Signals from Across the Visual Field But for Memory-Guided Comparisons Depend on Neurons Providing These Signals.

Authors:  Klaus Wimmer; Philip Spinelli; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of information storage in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Neuronal responses support a role for orbitofrontal cortex in cognitive set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Brianna J Sleezer; Giuliana A LoConte; Meghan D Castagno; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Memory-guided sensory comparisons in the prefrontal cortex: contribution of putative pyramidal cells and interneurons.

Authors:  Cory R Hussar; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Common rules guide comparisons of speed and direction of motion in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Cory R Hussar; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Linking neural activity to complex decisions.

Authors:  Benjamin Hayden; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.