Literature DB >> 21676799

Magnetic orientation and navigation in marine turtles, lobsters, and molluscs: concepts and conundrums.

Shaun D Cain1, Larry C Boles, John H Wang, Kenneth J Lohmann.   

Abstract

The Earth's magnetic field provides a pervasive source of directional information used by phylogenetically diverse marine animals. Behavioral experiments with sea turtles, spiny lobsters, and sea slugs have revealed that all have a magnetic compass sense, despite vast differences in the environment each inhabits and the spatial scale over which each moves. For two of these animals, the Earth's field also serves as a source of positional information. Hatchling loggerhead sea turtles from Florida responded to the magnetic fields found in three widely separated regions of the Atlantic Ocean by swimming in directions that would, in each case, facilitate movement along the migratory route. Thus, for young loggerheads, regional magnetic fields function as navigational markers and elicit changes in swimming direction at crucial geographic boundaries. Older turtles, as well as spiny lobsters, apparently acquire a "magnetic map" that enables them to use magnetic topography to determine their position relative to specific goals. Relatively little is known about the neural mechanisms that underlie magnetic orientation and navigation. A promising model system is the marine mollusc Tritonia diomedea, which possesses both a magnetic compass and a relatively simple nervous system. Six neurons in the brain of T. diomedea have been identified that respond to changes in magnetic fields. At least some of these appear to be ciliary motor neurons that generate or modulate the final behavioral output of the orientation circuitry. These findings represent an encouraging step toward a holistic understanding of the cells and circuitry that underlie magnetic orientation behavior in one model organism.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 21676799     DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.3.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  14 in total

1.  A magnetic protein biocompass.

Authors:  Siying Qin; Hang Yin; Celi Yang; Yunfeng Dou; Zhongmin Liu; Peng Zhang; He Yu; Yulong Huang; Jing Feng; Junfeng Hao; Jia Hao; Lizong Deng; Xiyun Yan; Xiaoli Dong; Zhongxian Zhao; Taijiao Jiang; Hong-Wei Wang; Shu-Jin Luo; Can Xie
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Polarized light modulates light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in birds.

Authors:  Rachel Muheim; Sissel Sjöberg; Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Changing and shielded magnetic fields suppress c-Fos expression in the navigation circuit: input from the magnetosensory system contributes to the internal representation of space in a subterranean rodent.

Authors:  Tomás Burger; Marcela Lucová; Regina E Moritz; Helmut H A Oelschläger; Rastislav Druga; Hynek Burda; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko; Pavel Nemec
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Expression patterns of cryptochrome genes in avian retina suggest involvement of Cry4 in light-dependent magnetoreception.

Authors:  Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez; Staffan Bensch; Rachel Muheim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Avian magnetoreception: elaborate iron mineral containing dendrites in the upper beak seem to be a common feature of birds.

Authors:  Gerald Falkenberg; Gerta Fleissner; Kirsten Schuchardt; Markus Kuehbacher; Peter Thalau; Henrik Mouritsen; Dominik Heyers; Gerd Wellenreuther; Guenther Fleissner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does maternal oviposition site influence offspring dispersal to suitable habitat?

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Timothy S Mitchell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update.

Authors:  Eliane Wajnberg; Daniel Acosta-Avalos; Odivaldo Cambraia Alves; Jandira Ferreira de Oliveira; Robert B Srygley; Darci M S Esquivel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Bats respond to very weak magnetic fields.

Authors:  Lan-Xiang Tian; Yong-Xin Pan; Walter Metzner; Jin-Shuo Zhang; Bing-Fang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extracellular recordings reveal absence of magneto sensitive units in the avian optic tectum.

Authors:  Edgardo Ramírez; Gonzalo Marín; Jorge Mpodozis; Juan-Carlos Letelier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  How Swift Is Cry-Mediated Magnetoreception? Conditioning in an American Cockroach Shows Sub-second Response.

Authors:  Pavel Slaby; Premysl Bartos; Jakub Karas; Radek Netusil; Kateřina Tomanova; Martin Vacha
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.