| Literature DB >> 21676230 |
Boris V Nemzer1, Liliana C Rodriguez, Linda Hammond, Robert Disilvestro, John M Hunter, Zbigniew Pietrzkowski.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measuring the effects of the acute intake of natural products on human biomarker concentrations, such as those related to oxidation and inflammation, can be an advantageous strategy for early clinical research on an ingredient or product.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21676230 PMCID: PMC3141640 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-67
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Phytochemical and antioxidant capacity analyses of PRB sample per serving size (3.0 fl oz or 90 mL)
| Compound/measurement | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Total Anthocyanins | 9 mg |
| Total Polyphenols | 360 mg |
| Total Proanthocyanidins | 170 mg |
| Chlorogenic Acid | 225 mg |
| Ellagic Acid | 3 mg |
| ORAC | 10,292 μmole TE |
| HORAC | 31,032 μmole TE |
| NORAC | 643 μmole TE |
| SORAC | 11,430 μmole TE |
| SOAC | 7,457 μmole TE |
| Total ORAC | 60,854 μmole TE |
TE = Trolox equivalents
Characteristics of study participants
| Initial Subjects | Subgroup Subjects | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Age in Years (SD) | Mean BMI (SD) | Females | Males | n | Mean Age in Years (SD) | Mean BMI (SD) | Females | Males | n | |
| 48.63 (4.00) | 29.47 (3.26) | 8 | 8 | 16 | 49.3 (4.72) | 30.08 (2.90) | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| 47.53 (3.09) | 28.62 (2.67) | 7 | 8 | 15 | 48.5 (3.30) | 29.13 (2.51) | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
SD=standard deviation
Serum 8-iso-PGF2-alpha levels at T0
| Treatment Group Subject Number | 8-iso-PGF2-alpha (pg/mL) | Control Group Subject Number | 8-iso-PGF2-alpha (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1431.2 | 17 | 310.9 |
| 2 | 323.7* | 18 | 131.9* |
| 3 | 946.8 | 19 | 1011.5 |
| 4 | 678.7 | 20 | 22.1* |
| 5 | 974 | 21 | 1121 |
| 6 | 772.4 | 23 | 107* |
| 7 | 770.9 | 24 | 818 |
| 8 | 330.2* | 25 | 206.4* |
| 9 | 728.4 | 26 | 1503 |
| 10 | 965.2 | 27 | 414.5 |
| 11 | 308.9* | 28 | 356.4 |
| 12 | 756.9 | 29 | 373.4 |
| 13 | 1432.8 | 30 | 11901 |
| 14 | 255.2* | 31 | 344.5 |
| 15 | 582.2* | 32 | 294 |
| 16 | 728.4* | ||
1subject data excluded due to hemolysis
*subjects excluded from subgroup analysis due to lowest 8-iso-PGF2-alpha levels
Figure 1Effect of PBR on serum 8-iso-PGF2-alpha levels, expressed as pg/mL + SEM. *p ≤ 0.001 as compared to T0 (paired T-test); and p < 0.05 as compared to placebo (unpaired T-test).
Figure 2Effect of PBR on AOPP levels; expressed as nM/mL + SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared to T0 (paired T-test).
Figure 3Effect of PBR on NO levels; expressed as μmoles/L + SEM.
Figure 4Effect of PBR on serum CRP levels; expressed as ng/mL + SEM.
Figure 5Effect of PBR on HORAC levels; expressed as μM GAE/L + SEM. *p < 0.01 as compared to T0 by paired T-test.
Percent change from T0 in HORAC levels in clinical study
| % Change over T0 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.1 ±7.19* | 67.5 ±7.20* | 54.5 ±6.52* | 75.8 ±9.21* | |
| 1 | 23.6 ±5.38 | 74.7 ±5.91* | 44.4 ±5.81* | 43.0 ±8.47 | |
*p < 0.05 as compared to T0 by paired T-test.