Literature DB >> 21673616

Correlation of radiographic and functional measurements in patients who underwent primary scoliosis surgery in adult age.

Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal1, Alejandro Gomez-Rice, Enrique Izquierdo, Javier Pizones, Lorenzo Zúñiga, Patricia Alvarez-González.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective radiographic and clinical analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether radiographic spinopelvic parameters correlate with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures, in the long run, in patients operated on scoliosis in adult age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are papers that correlate sagittal radiographic parameters with HRQOL scores for healthy spine as well as for some spinal disorders. However, there are limited studies evaluating correlations between HRQOL measures, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, and age in patients operated on scoliosis in adult age.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients, older than 21 years at surgery time (median: 50.2 years), were operated upon at a single center. All of them suffered mainly frontal deformity, idiopathic or degenerative curves, and long fusions, with more than a 2-year follow-up (median:8.5 years). Full-length freestanding radiographs, including the spine and pelvis, and SRS22 and SF36 instruments, were available for every patient at final follow-up. Sagittal and frontal radiographic parameters and age were analyzed for correlation with HRQOL. A multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: No significant correlation was found between frontal parameters and HRQOL measures. Spearman rank order test showed correlation (P < 0.001) between Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) activity and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (r = -0.44), pelvic tilt (PT) (r = -0.49), and age (r = -0.5). SRS total was correlated (P < 0.004) with PT (r = -0.32) and age (r = -0.41). SF36 physical function correlated (P < 0.001) with SVA (r = -0.44), PT (r = -0.45), and age (r = -0.56). After multivariate analysis, only age and PT persisted as possible predictors of worse SRS activity scores.
CONCLUSION: After primary surgery for adult scoliosis, frontal radiographic parameters did not correlate with HRQOL measures. In univariate analysis, patient age, SVA, and PT correlated with activity scores, although the correlation coefficients did not reach high values. After multivariate analysis, SVA was not a predictor of function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21673616     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318227336a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Sagittal spino-pelvic adjustment in severe Lenke 1 hypokyphotic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Christophe Vidal; Keyvan Mazda; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does Clinical Photography Influence Satisfaction With Surgery in Adult Patients Operated on for Spinal Deformity?

Authors:  Alejandro Gomez-Rice; Cristina Madrid; Enrique Izquierdo; Fernando Marco-MartÍnez; JesÚs A F Tresguerres; Felisa Sanchez-Mariscal
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  The cranial sagittal vertical axis (CrSVA) is a better radiographic measure to predict clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery than the C7 SVA: a monocentric study.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Seon-Jong Lee; Jeffrey L Gum; Sirichai Wilartratsami; Kathy M Blanke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Are sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters significantly associated with quality of life of adult spinal deformity patients? Multivariate linear regression analyses for pre-operative and short-term post-operative health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Mitsuru Takemoto; Louis Boissière; Jean-Marc Vital; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sanchez Perez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ahmet Alanay; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Adult Congenital Spine Deformity: Clinical Features and Motivations for Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo; José Sánchez-Márquez; Gloria Talavera; Ibrahim Obeid; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstück; Ferran Pellisé; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

6.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The differences in whole-body sagittal alignment between different postures in young, healthy adults.

Authors:  Rui Xue; Dai Liu; Yong Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Optimal indicators for identification of compensatory sagittal balance in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Shengbo Niu; Xiao Zhai; Yuanyuan Chen; Huan Yang; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.