Literature DB >> 33612102

Optimal indicators for identification of compensatory sagittal balance in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Shengbo Niu1, Xiao Zhai1, Yuanyuan Chen2, Huan Yang1, Changwei Yang3, Ming Li4.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
BACKGROUND: To determine whether radiological parameters such as maximal lumbar lordosis-maximal thoracic kyphosis (maxLL-maxTK), sacral slope-pelvic tilt(SS-PT) and sacral slope/pelvic tilt (SS/PT) could be used as indicators for the diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in compensatory sagittal balanced patients.
METHODS: Medical records of sagittal balanced DDD patients and asymptomatic adults within our hospital registry from July 2019 to November 2019 were reviewed. General characteristics and radiological parameters were evaluated between the two groups. Analysis of covariance with age as a covariate was conducted, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and areas under the curve (AUC) calculation. The max Youden index was calculated to identify the optimal sensitivity specificity pairs.
RESULTS: A total of 42 DDD patients and 199 asymptomatic adults were included. For those parameters that showed significant differences between the two groups, AUC for SS/PT and SS-PT were the largest, reaching 0.919 and 0.936, respectively. The sensitivity was 0.749, the specificity was 0.952 and the max Youden index was 0.701 when SS/PT = 1.635 was used as threshold. The max Youden index was found for a threshold of SS-PT =8.500, for which the sensitivity increased to 0.854, while the specificity decreased to 0.857.
CONCLUSIONS: Both SS/PT and SS-PT were significantly different between sagittal balanced DDD patients and asymptomatic adults. SS/PT < 1.6 and SS-PT < 8.5 could be used as indicators for the diagnosis of DDD patients with compensatory sagittal balance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compensatory mechanism; Compensatory sagittal balance; Degenerative disc disease; Optimal indicators; Pelvic tilt; Sacral slope

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33612102      PMCID: PMC7898748          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04063-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  28 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography.

Authors:  G Schneiderman; B Flannigan; S Kingston; J Thomas; W H Dillin; R G Watkins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The morphology of sagittal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers of East China: A novel radiological classification.

Authors:  Mingyuan Yang; Honglei Guo; Xinrui Wang; Shibo Xia; Xiaodong Zhu; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Age-related variations in global spinal alignment and sagittal balance in asymptomatic Japanese adults.

Authors:  Kunio Yokoyama; Masahiro Kawanishi; Makoto Yamada; Hidekazu Tanaka; Yutaka Ito; Shinji Kawabata; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.448

6.  Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers.

Authors:  R P Jackson; C Hales
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Standing sagittal alignment of the whole axial skeleton with reference to the gravity line in humans.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Takao Homma; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Animal models of regenerative medicine for biological treatment approaches of degenerative disc diseases.

Authors:  Demissew Shenegelegn Mern; Tanja Walsen; Anja Beierfuß; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.