Literature DB >> 21673601

The results of nonoperative treatment for three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in low-demand patients.

Halil Yalçin Yüksel1, Serdar Yılmaz, Ertuğrul Akşahin, Levent Celebi, Hasan Hilmi Muratli, Ali Biçimoğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of nonoperative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients who refused surgery or could not undergo surgery because of medical conditions.
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of prospective collected data.
SETTING: Educational and research hospital. Level IV, therapeutic case series. PATIENTS: Eighteen patients (eight three- and 10 four-part fractures) were included. The mean age was 68.2 ± 13.8 years (range, 39-90 years). The mean follow-up was 39.1 ± 12.4 months (range, 24-60 months). Patients were grouped into two: Group A being younger than 65 years and Group B 65 years or older. INTERVENTION: Standardized nonoperative treatment and follow-up protocols were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional and radiographic assessments were performed in posttreatment first year and at latest follow-up. Constant-Murley scores were also obtained for both shoulders.
RESULTS: The mean Constant-Murley score was 61.3 ± 13.5 (range, 40-85) at latest follow-up. Osteonecrosis was detected in five patients. All patients had significantly lower SF-36 scores for all subscales except mental health than the normal Turkish population. There was no significant difference between three- and four-part fractures regarding age and Constant-Murley scores. The mean Constant-Murley score of the Group A patients with three-part fractures was significantly higher when compared with the Group A patients with four-part fractures. There was no significant difference between patients with and without osteonecrosis regarding fracture types or the Constant-Murley scores at the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the individual fracture type does not have an influence on functional results, these results are better in patients younger than 65 years with three-part fractures. The results of the nonoperative treatment of these fractures are satisfactory even in elderly patients. The radiographic appearances did not correspond with the functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673601     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318210ea56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus].

Authors:  H Lill; A Ellwein; C Katthagen; C Voigt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients: Correlation Between Deviations and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Gustavo Jum Yamamoto; Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Fernando Brandão Andrade-Silva; Kodi Edson Kojima; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-11-02

3.  Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yongchuan Li; Liangyu Zhao; Lei Zhu; Jing Li; Aimin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical outcomes of allograft with locking compression plates for elderly four-part proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Xinran Ji; Qun Zhang; Xiangdang Liang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Comparing the treatment results of proximal humerus fracture based on surgical or nonsurgical methods.

Authors:  Mohammad Hadi Nouraei; Davoud Amirian Majd; Fereshteh Zamani
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-12-06

6.  Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Howard; Randa Berdusco; Franco Momoli; J Pollock; Allan Liew; Steve Papp; Karl-Andre Lalonde; Wade Gofton; Sara Ruggiero; Peter Lapner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Ekaterina Khmelnitskaya; Lauren E Lamont; Samuel A Taylor; Dean G Lorich; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-18

8.  Relationship between the functional outcomes and radiological results of conservatively treated displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: A prospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Kerem Canbora; Ozkan Kose; Atilla Polat; Levent Konukoglu; Mucahit Gorgec
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 9.  Operative versus non-operative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lin Xie; Fan Ding; Zhigang Zhao; Yan Chen; Danmou Xing
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-25

10.  Conservative treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Manuel Soler-Peiro; Lorena García-Martínez; Luis Aguilella; Marcelino Perez-Bermejo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.