OBJECTIVE: In this multicenter study, a new semiautomatic method for segmenting the cervical cord from C2 to C5 was used to investigate the correlation between cord atrophy and clinical disability in a large sample of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: T2 and 3-dimensional T1-weighted cervical cord scans and dual-echo brain scans were acquired from 143 healthy controls, 22 patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS), 101 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 79 patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), 58 patients with benign MS (BMS), and 75 patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) in 3 European centers. Normalized cervical cord cross-sectional area (CSAn) was measured by an active surface cord model. Between-group comparisons were performed using linear mixed-effect models. A nonparametric kernel estimator was used to obtain smoothed plots of CSA along the cervical cord. RESULTS: Cord CSAn was significantly lower in PPMS vs healthy controls, BMS vs RRMS, SPMS vs BMS, and RRMS. From C2 to C5, a net separation and definition of the plots of patients with BMS, PPMS, and SPMS was seen with respect to those of the other study groups. CSAn was correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = -0.49, p < 0.0001), with a differential effect among disease clinical phenotypes: no association in either CIS or in BMS; association in RRMS (r = -0.30, p = 0.001), SPMS (r = -0.34, p = 0.001), and PPMS (r = -0.27, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cord atrophy provides a relevant and useful marker for the characterization of clinical heterogeneity of patients with MS. The stability of this measure among different centers supports its use as potential outcome measure to monitor disease progression in multicenter trials.
OBJECTIVE: In this multicenter study, a new semiautomatic method for segmenting the cervical cord from C2 to C5 was used to investigate the correlation between cord atrophy and clinical disability in a large sample of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: T2 and 3-dimensional T1-weighted cervical cord scans and dual-echo brain scans were acquired from 143 healthy controls, 22 patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS), 101 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 79 patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), 58 patients with benign MS (BMS), and 75 patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) in 3 European centers. Normalized cervical cord cross-sectional area (CSAn) was measured by an active surface cord model. Between-group comparisons were performed using linear mixed-effect models. A nonparametric kernel estimator was used to obtain smoothed plots of CSA along the cervical cord. RESULTS: Cord CSAn was significantly lower in PPMS vs healthy controls, BMS vs RRMS, SPMS vs BMS, and RRMS. From C2 to C5, a net separation and definition of the plots of patients with BMS, PPMS, and SPMS was seen with respect to those of the other study groups. CSAn was correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = -0.49, p < 0.0001), with a differential effect among disease clinical phenotypes: no association in either CIS or in BMS; association in RRMS (r = -0.30, p = 0.001), SPMS (r = -0.34, p = 0.001), and PPMS (r = -0.27, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cord atrophy provides a relevant and useful marker for the characterization of clinical heterogeneity of patients with MS. The stability of this measure among different centers supports its use as potential outcome measure to monitor disease progression in multicenter trials.
Authors: Min Chen; Aaron Carass; Jiwon Oh; Govind Nair; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Rohit Bakshi; Antje Bischof; Peter A Calabresi; Eduardo Caverzasi; R Todd Constable; Esha Datta; Gina Kirkish; Govind Nair; Jiwon Oh; Daniel Pelletier; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; William Rooney; Snehashis Roy; Daniel Schwartz; Russell T Shinohara; Nancy L Sicotte; William A Stern; Ian Tagge; Shahamat Tauhid; Subhash Tummala; Roland G Henry Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Min Chen; Kateryna Cybulsky; Suradech Suthiphosuwan; Estelle Seyman; Blake Dewey; Marie Diener-West; Peter van Zijl; Jerry Prince; Daniel S Reich; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Lindsay S Cahill; Monan Angela Zhang; Valeria Ramaglia; Heather Whetstone; Melika Pahlevan Sabbagh; Tae Joon Yi; Laura Woo; Thomas S Przybycien; Marina Moshkova; Fei Linda Zhao; Olga L Rojas; Josephine Gomes; Stefanie Kuerten; Jennifer L Gommerman; John G Sled; Shannon E Dunn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 4.813