OBJECTIVE: To delineate the trajectories of Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) uptake using positron emission tomography, and hippocampal volume using magnetic resonance imaging and their relative associations with cognitive change at different stages in aging and Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The 59 study sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 819 participants 55 to 90 years of age with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and AD who were followed up during the period from 2005 to 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of change in level of Aβ42 in CSF, FDG uptake, hippocampal volume, and the Alzheimer Disease's Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale score during up to 36 months of follow-up by diagnostic group as well as prediction of cognitive change by each biomarker. RESULTS: Reductions in the level of Aβ42 in CSF were numerically greater in participants with normal cognition than in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD; whereas both glucose metabolic decline and hippocampal atrophy were significantly slower in participants with normal cognition than in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD. Positive APOE4 status accelerated hippocampal atrophic changes in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD, but did not modify rates of change in level of Aβ42 in CSF or FDG uptake. The Alzheimer Disease's Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores were related only to the baseline level of Aβ42 in CSF and the baseline FDG uptake in participants with normal cognition, which were about equally associated with change in FDG uptake and hippocampal volume in participants with mild cognitive impairment and best modeled by change in FDG uptake in participants with AD. CONCLUSION: Trajectories of Aβ42 level in CSF, FDG uptake, and hippocampal volume vary across different cognitive stages. The longitudinal patterns support a hypothetical sequence of AD pathology in which amyloid deposition is an early event before hypometabolism or hippocampal atrophy, suggesting that biomarker prediction for cognitive change is stage dependent.
OBJECTIVE: To delineate the trajectories of Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), fludeoxyglucoseF18 (FDG) uptake using positron emission tomography, and hippocampal volume using magnetic resonance imaging and their relative associations with cognitive change at different stages in aging and Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The 59 study sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 819 participants 55 to 90 years of age with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and AD who were followed up during the period from 2005 to 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of change in level of Aβ42 in CSF, FDG uptake, hippocampal volume, and the Alzheimer Disease's Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale score during up to 36 months of follow-up by diagnostic group as well as prediction of cognitive change by each biomarker. RESULTS: Reductions in the level of Aβ42 in CSF were numerically greater in participants with normal cognition than in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD; whereas both glucose metabolic decline and hippocampal atrophy were significantly slower in participants with normal cognition than in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD. Positive APOE4 status accelerated hippocampal atrophic changes in participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD, but did not modify rates of change in level of Aβ42 in CSF or FDG uptake. The Alzheimer Disease's Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores were related only to the baseline level of Aβ42 in CSF and the baseline FDG uptake in participants with normal cognition, which were about equally associated with change in FDG uptake and hippocampal volume in participants with mild cognitive impairment and best modeled by change in FDG uptake in participants with AD. CONCLUSION: Trajectories of Aβ42 level in CSF, FDG uptake, and hippocampal volume vary across different cognitive stages. The longitudinal patterns support a hypothetical sequence of AD pathology in which amyloid deposition is an early event before hypometabolism or hippocampal atrophy, suggesting that biomarker prediction for cognitive change is stage dependent.
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; Susan De Santi; Juan Li; Wai Hon Tsui; Yi Li; Madhu Boppana; Eugene Laska; Henry Rusinek; Mony J de Leon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alan E Hubbard; Jennifer Ahern; Nancy L Fleischer; Mark Van der Laan; Sheri A Lippman; Nicholas Jewell; Tim Bruckner; William A Satariano Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Trey Sunderland; Gary Linker; Nadeem Mirza; Karen T Putnam; David L Friedman; Lida H Kimmel; Judy Bergeson; Guy J Manetti; Matthew Zimmermann; Brian Tang; John J Bartko; Robert M Cohen Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G Chételat; B Landeau; F Eustache; F Mézenge; F Viader; V de la Sayette; B Desgranges; J-C Baron Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; Rachel Mistur; Remigiusz Switalski; Wai Hon Tsui; Lidia Glodzik; Yi Li; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Susan De Santi; Barry Reisberg; Thomas Wisniewski; Mony J de Leon Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Richard J Caselli; Amylou C Dueck; David Osborne; Marwan N Sabbagh; Donald J Connor; Geoffrey L Ahern; Leslie C Baxter; Steven Z Rapcsak; Jiong Shi; Bryan K Woodruff; Dona E C Locke; Charlene Hoffman Snyder; Gene E Alexander; Rosa Rademakers; Eric M Reiman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Polvikoski; R Sulkava; M Haltia; K Kainulainen; A Vuorio; A Verkkoniemi; L Niinistö; P Halonen; K Kontula Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peder Buchhave; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Erik Stomrud; Elisabet Londos; Niels Andreasen; Lennart Minthon; Oskar Hansson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Val Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Matt A Bernstein; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Bradley F Boeve; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-07
Authors: Joshua D Grill; Lijie Di; Po H Lu; Cathy Lee; John Ringman; Liana G Apostolova; Nicole Chow; Omid Kohannim; Jeffrey L Cummings; Paul M Thompson; David Elashoff Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Kevin P High; Mark Brennan-Ing; David B Clifford; Mardge H Cohen; Judith Currier; Steven G Deeks; Sherry Deren; Rita B Effros; Kelly Gebo; Jörg J Goronzy; Amy C Justice; Alan Landay; Jules Levin; Paolo G Miotti; Robert J Munk; Heidi Nass; Charles R Rinaldo; Michael G Shlipak; Russell Tracy; Victor Valcour; David E Vance; Jeremy D Walston; Paul Volberding Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota; Anne M Fagan; Janet M Duchek; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: James R Hall; Leigh A Johnson; Robert C Barber; Hoa T Vo; A Scott Winter; Sid E O'Bryant Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; Hiroko H Dodge; N Maritza Dowling; S Duke Han; Elena A Erosheva; William J Jagust Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.422