BACKGROUND: The APOE epsilon4 allele is associated with the risk of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. The age at which memory decline diverges among persons who are homozygous for the APOE epsilon4 allele, those who are heterozygous for the allele, and noncarriers is unknown. METHODS: Using local advertisements, we recruited cognitively normal subjects between the ages of 21 and 97 years, who were grouped according to their APOE epsilon4 status. We then followed the subjects with longitudinal neuropsychological testing. Anyone in whom mild cognitive impairment or dementia developed during follow-up was excluded. We compared the rates of decline in predetermined cognitive measures between carriers and noncarriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele, using a mixed model for longitudinal change with age. RESULTS: We analyzed 815 subjects: 317 APOE epsilon4 carriers (79 who were homozygous for the APOE epsilon4 allele and 238 who were heterozygous) and 498 noncarriers. Carriers, as compared with noncarriers, were generally younger (mean age, 58.0 vs. 61.4 years; P<0.001) and were followed for a longer period (5.3 vs. 4.7 years, P=0.01), with an equivalent duration of formal education (15.4 years) and proportion of women (69%). Longitudinal decline in memory in carriers began before the age of 60 years and showed greater acceleration than in noncarriers (P=0.03), with a possible allele-dose effect (P=0.008). We observed similar although weaker effects on measures of visuospatial awareness and general mental status. CONCLUSIONS: Age-related memory decline in APOE epsilon4 carriers diverges from that of noncarriers before the age of 60 years, despite ongoing normal clinical status. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: The APOE epsilon4 allele is associated with the risk of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. The age at which memory decline diverges among persons who are homozygous for the APOE epsilon4 allele, those who are heterozygous for the allele, and noncarriers is unknown. METHODS: Using local advertisements, we recruited cognitively normal subjects between the ages of 21 and 97 years, who were grouped according to their APOE epsilon4 status. We then followed the subjects with longitudinal neuropsychological testing. Anyone in whom mild cognitive impairment or dementia developed during follow-up was excluded. We compared the rates of decline in predetermined cognitive measures between carriers and noncarriers of the APOE epsilon4 allele, using a mixed model for longitudinal change with age. RESULTS: We analyzed 815 subjects: 317 APOE epsilon4 carriers (79 who were homozygous for the APOE epsilon4 allele and 238 who were heterozygous) and 498 noncarriers. Carriers, as compared with noncarriers, were generally younger (mean age, 58.0 vs. 61.4 years; P<0.001) and were followed for a longer period (5.3 vs. 4.7 years, P=0.01), with an equivalent duration of formal education (15.4 years) and proportion of women (69%). Longitudinal decline in memory in carriers began before the age of 60 years and showed greater acceleration than in noncarriers (P=0.03), with a possible allele-dose effect (P=0.008). We observed similar although weaker effects on measures of visuospatial awareness and general mental status. CONCLUSIONS: Age-related memory decline in APOE epsilon4 carriers diverges from that of noncarriers before the age of 60 years, despite ongoing normal clinical status. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: E H Corder; A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D E Schmechel; P C Gaskell; G W Small; A D Roses; J L Haines; M A Pericak-Vance Journal: Science Date: 1993-08-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D Schmechel; P H George-Hyslop; M A Pericak-Vance; S H Joo; B L Rosi; J F Gusella; D R Crapper-MacLachlan; M J Alberts Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Azra Kurbasic; Alaitz Poveda; Yan Chen; Asa Agren; Elisabeth Engberg; Frank B Hu; Ingegerd Johansson; Ines Barroso; Anders Brändström; Göran Hallmans; Frida Renström; Paul W Franks Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2014-12-01
Authors: Liana G Apostolova; Kristy S Hwang; John P Andrawis; Amity E Green; Sona Babakchanian; Jonathan H Morra; Jeffrey L Cummings; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Paul S Aisen; William J Jagust; Robert A Koeppe; Chester A Mathis; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Gene E Alexander; Kaitlin L Bergfield; Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; Krista D Hanson; Lan Lin; Daniel Bandy; Richard J Caselli; James R Moeller Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Val Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Matt A Bernstein; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Bradley F Boeve; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-07
Authors: Elliott J Mufson; Lester Binder; Scott E Counts; Steven T DeKosky; Leyla de Toledo-Morrell; Stephen D Ginsberg; Milos D Ikonomovic; Sylvia E Perez; Stephen W Scheff Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-11-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Dona E C Locke; Cynthia M Stonnington; Michael L Thomas; Richard J Caselli Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Li Zhu; Minghao Zhong; Gregory A Elder; Mary Sano; David M Holtzman; Sam Gandy; Christopher Cardozo; Vahram Haroutunian; Nikolaos K Robakis; Dongming Cai Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dona E C Locke; Amylou C Dueck; Cynthia M Stonnington; David S Knopman; Yonas E Geda; Richard J Caselli Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.384