Sarah M Camhi1, Jennie Phillips, Deborah R Young. 1. Exercise and Health Sciences Department, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, USA. sarah.camhi@umb.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical education (PE) can improve physical fitness; however, little research has evaluated PE's long-term influence. The purpose is to determine PE's longitudinal effects on fitness in a group of adolescent girls and to determine whether body mass index (BMI) status influenced any potential effects. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in daily PE throughout their ninth grade. Data were collected at baseline and at the end of 9th, 10th, and 11th grades. BMI (kg/m(2) ) was classified into Centers for Disease Control and Prevention percentiles. Fitness was estimated from a 3-stage step test (change in exercise heart rate (HR) indicated improved fitness) and analyzed using repeated measures general linear modeling with adjustments for baseline BMI, baseline age, ethnicity, intervention status, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity outside PE. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 131 girls (61% of sample) who were predominantly African American, 13.8 ± 0.4 years, mean BMI 24.7 ± 6.1 kg/m(2) at the ninth-grade baseline. Overall, stage 1 HR (bpm) decreased from baseline to 9th grade (-5.5 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001), baseline to 10th grade (-7.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001), and baseline to 11th grade (-7.0 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001). Change differed by BMI status; fitness improvement was significant for normal and overweight, but not obese girls. After 2 years, change in stage 1 HR (bpm) was significantly different between BMI categories: normal-weight girls versus obese girls (-10.0 ± 3.2, p = 0.002) and overweight girls versus obese girls (-9.3 ± 3.9, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fitness differences by BMI exist after a PE program in adolescent girls: fitness improved and was maintained in normal-weight and overweight girls, whereby obese girls had no improvement in fitness.
BACKGROUND: Physical education (PE) can improve physical fitness; however, little research has evaluated PE's long-term influence. The purpose is to determine PE's longitudinal effects on fitness in a group of adolescent girls and to determine whether body mass index (BMI) status influenced any potential effects. METHODS:Participants were enrolled in daily PE throughout their ninth grade. Data were collected at baseline and at the end of 9th, 10th, and 11th grades. BMI (kg/m(2) ) was classified into Centers for Disease Control and Prevention percentiles. Fitness was estimated from a 3-stage step test (change in exercise heart rate (HR) indicated improved fitness) and analyzed using repeated measures general linear modeling with adjustments for baseline BMI, baseline age, ethnicity, intervention status, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity outside PE. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 131 girls (61% of sample) who were predominantly African American, 13.8 ± 0.4 years, mean BMI 24.7 ± 6.1 kg/m(2) at the ninth-grade baseline. Overall, stage 1 HR (bpm) decreased from baseline to 9th grade (-5.5 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001), baseline to 10th grade (-7.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001), and baseline to 11th grade (-7.0 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001). Change differed by BMI status; fitness improvement was significant for normal and overweight, but not obesegirls. After 2 years, change in stage 1 HR (bpm) was significantly different between BMI categories: normal-weight girls versus obesegirls (-10.0 ± 3.2, p = 0.002) and overweight girls versus obesegirls (-9.3 ± 3.9, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fitness differences by BMI exist after a PE program in adolescent girls: fitness improved and was maintained in normal-weight and overweight girls, whereby obesegirls had no improvement in fitness.
Authors: Russell R Pate; Michael G Davis; Thomas N Robinson; Elaine J Stone; Thomas L McKenzie; Judith C Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2002-05
Authors: Marcia Bayne-Smith; Paul S Fardy; Ann Azzollini; John Magel; Kathryn H Schmitz; Denise Agin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Russell R Pate; Ruth Saunders; Rod K Dishman; Cheryl Addy; Marsha Dowda; Dianne S Ward Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Steven H Kelder; Paul D Mitchell; Thomas L McKenzie; Carol Derby; Patricia K Strikmiller; Russell V Luepker; Elaine J Stone Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2003-08
Authors: Colin Boreham; Paula J Robson; Alison M Gallagher; Gordon W Cran; J Maurice Savage; Liam J Murray Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2004-10-05 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Miguel Peralta; Diana A Santos; Duarte Henriques-Neto; Gerson Ferrari; Hugo Sarmento; Adilson Marques Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 3.390