Literature DB >> 21666234

Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration in digital fundus images.

Carla Agurto1, E Simon Barriga, Victor Murray, Sheila Nemeth, Robert Crammer, Wendall Bauman, Gilberto Zamora, Marios S Pattichis, Peter Soliz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the performance of an algorithm that automatically classifies images with pathologic features commonly found in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
METHODS: Retinal digital photographs (N = 2247) of three fields of view (FOV) were obtained of the eyes of 822 patients at two centers: The Retina Institute of South Texas (RIST, San Antonio, TX) and The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA). Ground truth was provided for the presence of pathologic conditions, including microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates, neovascularization in the optic disc and elsewhere, drusen, abnormal pigmentation, and geographic atrophy. The algorithm was used to report on the presence or absence of disease. A detection threshold was applied to obtain different values of sensitivity and specificity with respect to ground truth and to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: The system achieved an average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 for detection of DR and of 0.92 for detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR). With a fixed specificity of 0.50, the system's sensitivity ranged from 0.92 for all DR cases to 1.00 for clinically significant macular edema (CSME).
CONCLUSIONS: A computer-aided algorithm was trained to detect different types of pathologic retinal conditions. The cases of hard exudates within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the fovea (surrogate for CSME) were detected with very high accuracy (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.50), whereas mild nonproliferative DR was the most challenging condition (sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.50). The algorithm was also tested on images with signs of AMD, achieving a performance of AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.50).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21666234      PMCID: PMC3176039          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-7075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition.

Authors:  Alan D Fleming; Sam Philip; Keith A Goatman; John A Olson; Peter F Sharp
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Monoscopic versus stereoscopic photography in screening for clinically significant macular edema.

Authors:  Christopher J Welty; Anita Agarwal; Lawrence M Merin; Amy Chomsky
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

3.  Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleophthalmology.

Authors:  Christopher J Rudnisky; Matthew T S Tennant; Alexander R de Leon; Bradley J Hinz; Mark D J Greve
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Automated grading for diabetic retinopathy: a large-scale audit using arbitration by clinical experts.

Authors:  Alan D Fleming; Keith A Goatman; Sam Philip; Gordon J Prescott; Peter F Sharp; John A Olson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Automated diagnosis of retinopathy by content-based image retrieval.

Authors:  Edward Chaum; Thomas P Karnowski; V Priya Govindasamy; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Kenneth W Tobin
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

8.  Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in a fundus photographic screening population.

Authors:  Nicolai Larsen; Jannik Godt; Michael Grunkin; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Michael Larsen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Detection of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmoscopy versus photography--Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group.

Authors:  J Kinyoun; F Barton; M Fisher; L Hubbard; L Aiello; F Ferris
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Information fusion for diabetic retinopathy CAD in digital color fundus photographs.

Authors:  Meindert Niemeijer; Michael D Abramoff; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  10 in total

1.  Automatic differentiation of color fundus images containing drusen or exudates using a contextual spatial pyramid approach.

Authors:  Mark J J P van Grinsven; Thomas Theelen; Leonard Witkamp; Job van der Heijden; Johannes P H van de Ven; Carel B Hoyng; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Decision support system for age-related macular degeneration using discrete wavelet transform.

Authors:  Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; U Rajendra Acharya; Joel E W Koh; Chua Kuang Chua; Jen Hong Tan; Vinod Chandran; Choo Min Lim; Kevin Noronha; Augustinus Laude; Louis Tong
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  A review on automatic analysis techniques for color fundus photographs.

Authors:  Renátó Besenczi; János Tóth; András Hajdu
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology

Authors:  Kadircan Keskinbora; Fatih Güven
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-05

5.  Pivotal Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Autonomous Detection of Referrable and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Eli Ipp; David Liljenquist; Bruce Bode; Viral N Shah; Steven Silverstein; Carl D Regillo; Jennifer I Lim; SriniVas Sadda; Amitha Domalpally; Gerry Gray; Malavika Bhaskaranand; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Kaushal Solanki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  FunSwin: A deep learning method to analysis diabetic retinopathy grade and macular edema risk based on fundus images.

Authors:  Zhaomin Yao; Yizhe Yuan; Zhenning Shi; Wenxin Mao; Gancheng Zhu; Guoxu Zhang; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Which Color Channel Is Better for Diagnosing Retinal Diseases Automatically in Color Fundus Photographs?

Authors:  Sangeeta Biswas; Md Iqbal Aziz Khan; Md Tanvir Hossain; Angkan Biswas; Takayoshi Nakai; Johan Rohdin
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 8.  A survey on computer aided diagnosis for ocular diseases.

Authors:  Zhuo Zhang; Ruchir Srivastava; Huiying Liu; Xiangyu Chen; Lixin Duan; Damon Wing Kee Wong; Chee Keong Kwoh; Tien Yin Wong; Jiang Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Automatic Screening and Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration from Texture Analysis of Fundus Images.

Authors:  Thanh Vân Phan; Lama Seoud; Hadi Chakor; Farida Cheriet
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Artificial Intelligence to Stratify Severity of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and Predict Risk of Progression to Late AMD.

Authors:  Alauddin Bhuiyan; Tien Yin Wong; Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Arun Govindaiah; Eric H Souied; R Theodore Smith
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.