PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the performance of an algorithm that automatically classifies images with pathologic features commonly found in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Retinal digital photographs (N = 2247) of three fields of view (FOV) were obtained of the eyes of 822 patients at two centers: The Retina Institute of South Texas (RIST, San Antonio, TX) and The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA). Ground truth was provided for the presence of pathologic conditions, including microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates, neovascularization in the optic disc and elsewhere, drusen, abnormal pigmentation, and geographic atrophy. The algorithm was used to report on the presence or absence of disease. A detection threshold was applied to obtain different values of sensitivity and specificity with respect to ground truth and to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The system achieved an average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 for detection of DR and of 0.92 for detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR). With a fixed specificity of 0.50, the system's sensitivity ranged from 0.92 for all DR cases to 1.00 for clinically significant macular edema (CSME). CONCLUSIONS: A computer-aided algorithm was trained to detect different types of pathologic retinal conditions. The cases of hard exudates within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the fovea (surrogate for CSME) were detected with very high accuracy (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.50), whereas mild nonproliferative DR was the most challenging condition (sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.50). The algorithm was also tested on images with signs of AMD, achieving a performance of AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.50).
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the performance of an algorithm that automatically classifies images with pathologic features commonly found in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Retinal digital photographs (N = 2247) of three fields of view (FOV) were obtained of the eyes of 822 patients at two centers: The Retina Institute of South Texas (RIST, San Antonio, TX) and The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA). Ground truth was provided for the presence of pathologic conditions, including microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates, neovascularization in the optic disc and elsewhere, drusen, abnormal pigmentation, and geographic atrophy. The algorithm was used to report on the presence or absence of disease. A detection threshold was applied to obtain different values of sensitivity and specificity with respect to ground truth and to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The system achieved an average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 for detection of DR and of 0.92 for detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR). With a fixed specificity of 0.50, the system's sensitivity ranged from 0.92 for all DR cases to 1.00 for clinically significant macular edema (CSME). CONCLUSIONS: A computer-aided algorithm was trained to detect different types of pathologic retinal conditions. The cases of hard exudates within 1 disc diameter (DD) of the fovea (surrogate for CSME) were detected with very high accuracy (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.50), whereas mild nonproliferative DR was the most challenging condition (sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.50). The algorithm was also tested on images with signs of AMD, achieving a performance of AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.50).
Authors: Alan D Fleming; Sam Philip; Keith A Goatman; John A Olson; Peter F Sharp Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christopher J Rudnisky; Matthew T S Tennant; Alexander R de Leon; Bradley J Hinz; Mark D J Greve Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 1.882
Authors: Alan D Fleming; Keith A Goatman; Sam Philip; Gordon J Prescott; Peter F Sharp; John A Olson Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Edward Chaum; Thomas P Karnowski; V Priya Govindasamy; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Kenneth W Tobin Journal: Retina Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Mark J J P van Grinsven; Thomas Theelen; Leonard Witkamp; Job van der Heijden; Johannes P H van de Ven; Carel B Hoyng; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; U Rajendra Acharya; Joel E W Koh; Chua Kuang Chua; Jen Hong Tan; Vinod Chandran; Choo Min Lim; Kevin Noronha; Augustinus Laude; Louis Tong Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Eli Ipp; David Liljenquist; Bruce Bode; Viral N Shah; Steven Silverstein; Carl D Regillo; Jennifer I Lim; SriniVas Sadda; Amitha Domalpally; Gerry Gray; Malavika Bhaskaranand; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Kaushal Solanki Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01
Authors: Alauddin Bhuiyan; Tien Yin Wong; Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Arun Govindaiah; Eric H Souied; R Theodore Smith Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.283