OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if working memory (WM) performance is significantly improved after the delivery of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), compared to an active comparator or sham. METHODS: Ten participants undertook three experimental sessions in which they received 10 min of anodal tDCS (active comparator), tRNS or shamtDCS whilst performing the Sternberg WM task. Intra-stimulation engagement in a WM task was undertaken as this has been previously shown to enhance the effects of tDCS. Experimental sessions were separated by a minimum of 1 week. Immediately prior to and after each stimulation session the participants were measured on speed and accuracy of performance on an n-back task. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in speed of performance following anodal tDCS on the 2-back WM task; this was the only significant finding. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not provide support for the hypothesis that tRNS improves WM. However, the study does provide confirmation of previous findings that anodal tDCS enhances some aspects of DLPFC functioning. Methodological limitations that may have contributed to the lack of significant findings following tRNS are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE: Anodal tDCS may have significant implications for WM remediation in psychiatric conditions, particularly schizophrenia. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if working memory (WM) performance is significantly improved after the delivery of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), compared to an active comparator or sham. METHODS: Ten participants undertook three experimental sessions in which they received 10 min of anodal tDCS (active comparator), tRNS or sham tDCS whilst performing the Sternberg WM task. Intra-stimulation engagement in a WM task was undertaken as this has been previously shown to enhance the effects of tDCS. Experimental sessions were separated by a minimum of 1 week. Immediately prior to and after each stimulation session the participants were measured on speed and accuracy of performance on an n-back task. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in speed of performance following anodal tDCS on the 2-back WM task; this was the only significant finding. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not provide support for the hypothesis that tRNS improves WM. However, the study does provide confirmation of previous findings that anodal tDCS enhances some aspects of DLPFC functioning. Methodological limitations that may have contributed to the lack of significant findings following tRNS are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE: Anodal tDCS may have significant implications for WM remediation in psychiatric conditions, particularly schizophrenia. Copyright Â
Authors: Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Cheyenne Allenby; Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Anthony Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Caryn Lerman; James Loughead Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 8.955