Literature DB >> 21665494

Predictors for response to intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in prostate cancer cases with biochemical progression after surgery.

Alessandro Sciarra1, Susanna Cattarino, Alessandro Gentilucci, Andrea Alfarone, Michele Innocenzi, Vincenzo Gentile, Stefano Salciccia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define characteristics of the first cycle of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) that would predict for outcomes in a long term follow-up.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1996 we started a prospective study of IAD for the treatment of biochemical progression (BP) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC). The end-points of the trial were time to clinical progression (CP) and time to castration resistance PC (CRPC). Eighty-four cases were included in the study. In all cases, after an initial induction period, an acceptable nadir to switch from on-to-off-phase of IAD was considered to be a serum PSA < 1.0 ng/ml. MEASUREMENTS: As possible predictors for time to CP and CRPC, we analyzed pretreatment parameters such as age, Gleason Score, serum PSA, testosterone, chromogranina A (CgA) levels, and characteristics from the first cycle of IAD.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up during IAD was 88.6 ± 16.7 months; 29.7% of patients developed CRPC and 14.2% of cases showed a CP with a mean time of 88.4 ± 14.3 months and 106.5 ± 20.6 months, respectively. At univariate and multivariate analysis, the PSA nadir during the first on-phase period and the first off-phase interval resulted in significant and independent predictors (P < 0.001) of the time to CRPC and CP. In particular for cases with a PSA nadir > 0.4 ng/ml and for those with an off-phase interval ≤ 24 weeks, the risk of CRPC and CP during IAD was 2.7-2.5 and 3.0-3.1 times that for patients with a PSA nadir ≤ 0.1 ng/ml and with an off-phase interval > 48 weeks, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cases with BP after RP selected to IAD that show at the first cycle a PSA nadir ≤ 0.1 ng/ml and a off-phase interval ≥ 48 weeks may identify candidates who will experience better response to IAD treatments and delayed CP or CRPC development.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665494     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ajjai Alva; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer: is intermittent therapy the new standard of care?

Authors:  L Klotz; P Toren
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  [Salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer recurrence: A review].

Authors:  D K Osmonov; A V Aksenov; C A Jilg; W Schultze-Seeman; C M Naumann; M F Hamann; K Bothe; K-P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with recurrent prostate cancer who underwent salvage extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Daniar K Osmonov; Alexey V Aksenov; David Trick; Carsten M Naumann; Moritz F Hamann; Amr Abou Faddan; Klaus-Peter Jünemann
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Intermittent, low-dose, antiandrogen monotherapy as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Choi; Seung Ryeol Lee; Young Kwon Hong; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.