Literature DB >> 21664959

Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.

A A Westen1, D M T Dekker, J J Briaire, J H M Frijns.   

Abstract

The common assumption that the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) has a linear relationship with the number of excited nerve fibres is derived from the acoustical unitary response concept. This study tests the validity of this hypothesis for electrical stimulation. Five guinea pigs were implanted with the tip of a human HiFocus electrode. eCAPs were measured with the forward masking paradigm, using anodic- and cathodic-leading biphasic current pulses and the inter-pulse interval was varied. Masker and probe amplitudes were varied either individually or simultaneously. Surprisingly, at high levels decreasing eCAP amplitudes were measured with increasing stimulus current. In search for an explanation, the experimental conditions were implemented in our 3D computational model of the implanted guinea pig cochlea to perform a functional comparison. In the final experiment, with fixed inter-pulse interval (IPI) and anodic-leading pulses, increasing stimulus currents showed growing numbers of excited nerve fibres and decreasing eCAP amplitudes at high levels, again. While simulating the relative contribution of single fibres to the overall eCAP, an explanation for this could be found in a waveform change in the modelled single fibre action potentials at high levels. We conclude that highly stimulated nerve fibres have another contribution to the eCAP response than lower stimulated fibres, which leads to a reduction of the eCAP amplitude at high levels.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664959     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

3.  A phenomenological computational model of the evoked action potential fitted to human cochlear implant responses.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos-de-Miguel; José M Escobar; David Greiner; Domingo Benítez; Eduardo Rodríguez; Albert Oliver; Marcos Hernández; Ángel Ramos-Macías
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 4.  Ups and Downs in 75 Years of Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24

5.  The sensitivity of different methods for detecting abnormalities in auditory nerve function.

Authors:  Tianhao Lu; Qiang Li; Chen Zhang; Min Chen; Zhengming Wang; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Interpreting the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and on Neural Health Estimates.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Colette M McKay; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.