Literature DB >> 21664724

A home health agency's pandemic preparedness and experience with the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Terri Rebmann1, Barbara Citarella, Divya S Subramaniam, Dipti P Subramaniam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate pandemic preparedness is imperative for home health agencies.
METHODS: A 23-item pandemic preparedness survey was administered to home health agencies in the spring of 2010. The Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test was used to evaluate the relationships between agency size and preparedness indicators. Significant findings were further analyzed by the Mann-Whitney (MW) U post hoc test.
RESULTS: The response rate was 25% (526/2,119). Approximately one-third of respondents (30.4%; n = 131) reported experiencing trouble obtaining supplies during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Small agencies were significantly more likely (Krusal-Wallis [KW] = 9.2; P < .01) to report having trouble obtaining supplies than larger-sized agencies (Mann-Whitney [MW] = 14,080; P < .01). Most home health agencies (87.3%; n = 459) reported having a pandemic influenza plan. One-third (33.5%; n = 176) reported having no surge capacity; only 27.0% (n = 142) reported having at least a 20% surge capacity. The largest agencies were significantly more likely (KW = 138; P < .001) to report having at least 20% surge capacity than medium-sized agencies (MW = 7,812; P = .001) or small agencies (MW = 8,306; P < .001). Approximately 80% (n = 414) reported stockpiling personal protective equipment. Three-quarters (71.3%; n = 375) reported fit-testing staff, and half (49.2%; n = 259) reported participating in disaster drills. The majority of home health professionals (75.1%; n = 395) reported having a personal/family disaster plan in place.
CONCLUSION: There are gaps in US home health agency pandemic preparedness, including surge capacity and participation in disaster drills, that need to be addressed.
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664724     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  Which recommendations are considered essential for outbreak preparedness by first responders?

Authors:  Evelien Belfroid; Aura Timen; Jim E van Steenbergen; Anita Huis; Marlies E J L Hulscher
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 2.  Assessing the infection prevention components of home health emergency management plans.

Authors:  Terri Rebmann; Barbara Citarella; Dipti P Subramaniam; Divya S Subramaniam
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  The state of infection prevention and control at home health agencies in the United States prior to COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jingjing Shang; Ashley M Chastain; Uduwanage Gayani E Perera; Andrew W Dick; Caroline J Fu; Elizabeth A Madigan; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Dealing with COVID-19 Epidemic in Italy: Responses from Regional Organizational Models during the First Phase of the Epidemic.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Specchia; Andrea Di Pilla; Martina Sapienza; Maria Teresa Riccardi; Americo Cicchetti; Gianfranco Damiani; Instant Report Group
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.