Literature DB >> 21664573

Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors.

John C Meadows1, Lindsey A Shepperd, Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Theresa C Lancaster, Alicja M Sochaj, Graham J Buttrick, Kevin G Hardwick, Jonathan B A Millar.   

Abstract

The spindle checkpoint is the prime cell-cycle control mechanism that ensures sister chromatids are bioriented before anaphase takes place. Aurora B kinase, the catalytic subunit of the chromosome passenger complex, both destabilizes kinetochore attachments that do not generate tension and simultaneously maintains the spindle checkpoint signal. However, it is unclear how the checkpoint is silenced following chromosome biorientation. We demonstrate that association of type 1 phosphatase (PP1(Dis2)) with both the N terminus of Spc7 and the nonmotor domains of the Klp5-Klp6 (kinesin-8) complex is necessary to counteract Aurora B kinase to efficiently silence the spindle checkpoint. The role of Klp5 and Klp6 in checkpoint silencing is specific to this class of kinesin and independent of their motor activities. These data demonstrate that at least two distinct pools of PP1, one kinetochore associated and the other motor associated, are needed to silence the spindle checkpoint.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664573      PMCID: PMC3792844          DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cell        ISSN: 1534-5807            Impact factor:   12.270


  47 in total

1.  Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Guohong Xia; Xuelian Luo; Toshiyuki Habu; Josep Rizo; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Insight into the molecular mechanism of the multitasking kinesin-8 motor.

Authors:  Carsten Peters; Katjuša Brejc; Lisa Belmont; Andrew J Bodey; Yan Lee; Ming Yu; Jun Guo; Roman Sakowicz; James Hartman; Carolyn A Moores
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Jason Stumpff; George von Dassow; Michael Wagenbach; Charles Asbury; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  Kinesin-8 motors act cooperatively to mediate length-dependent microtubule depolymerization.

Authors:  Vladimir Varga; Cecile Leduc; Volker Bormuth; Stefan Diez; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Mohan L Gupta; Pedro Carvalho; David M Roof; David Pellman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function.

Authors:  Michael A Lampson; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 20.808

7.  Molecular analysis of kinetochore architecture in fission yeast.

Authors:  Xingkun Liu; Ian McLeod; Scott Anderson; John R Yates; Xiangwei He
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism.

Authors:  Vincent Vanoosthuyse; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Kinesin-8 from fission yeast: a heterodimeric, plus-end-directed motor that can couple microtubule depolymerization to cargo movement.

Authors:  Paula M Grissom; Thomas Fiedler; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; Daniela Nicastro; Robert R West; J Richard McIntosh
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Yinghui Mao; Arshad Desai; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  84 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance or the cuckoo clock.

Authors:  Jonathon Pines; Iain Hagan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Mitotic phosphatase activity is required for MCC maintenance during the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Kristen M Foss; Alexander C Robeson; Sally Kornbluth; Liguo Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The signaling network that silences the spindle assembly checkpoint upon the establishment of chromosome bipolar attachment.

Authors:  Fengzhi Jin; Yanchang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 10.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.