Literature DB >> 21660497

Significance of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Jae Hung Jung1, Jae Won Lee, Francis Raymond P Arkoncel, Nam Hoon Cho, Noor Ashani Md Yusoff, Kwang Jin Kim, Jae Mann Song, Sung Jin Kim, Koon Ho Rha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, more detailed histopathological variables such as perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) have been investigated as prognostic factors for adverse pathologic findings on the radical prostatectomy specimen. We aim to determine whether these pathological factors are associated with adverse pathologic features after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).
METHODS: All 407 patients who underwent RALP with pelvic lymphadenectomy between July 2005 and December 2009 were analyzed, retrospectively. We investigated the association of these three pathological parameters with adverse pathological findings in RALP specimen and biochemical recurrence using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: The PNI and LVI were significantly associated with a higher pathological stage, a higher pathological Gleason score, a higher tumor volume in RALP specimen, a higher frequency of positive surgical margins, and a higher frequency of seminal vesicle invasion. In addition, PNI correlated with preoperative PSA, clinical stage, and Gleason score on needle biopsy. However, the HGPIN was not significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics studied. Using log-rank test, presence of PNI (P < 0.001) increases the probability of biochemical recurrence. On multivariate analysis, all three pathological parameters were not significantly correlated with biochemical recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Although presence of PNI and LVI in RALP specimen correlated with multiple adverse clinicopathological factors, it did not predict biochemical recurrence, thus limiting its clinical usefulness. HGPIN was not significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21660497     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1790-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after local treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Yan-Biao Liao; Peng Xu; Wu-Ran Wei; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?

Authors:  Fairleigh Reeves; Christopher M Hovens; Laurence Harewood; Shane Battye; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Donghyun Lee; Chunwoo Lee; Taekmin Kwon; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-07-24

4.  Disease-specific outcomes of radical prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time.

Authors:  Sigve Andersen; Elin Richardsen; Yngve Nordby; Nora Ness; Oystein Størkersen; Khalid Al-Shibli; Tom Donnem; Helena Bertilsson; Lill-Tove Busund; Anders Angelsen; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhen-Lei Zha; Wei Qu; Hu Zhao; Jun Yuan; Ye-Jun Feng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and its association with their clinicopathological features: An updated PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuan Jun; Yuefang Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Correlation of Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System scoring on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological factors in radical prostatectomy material in Turkish prostate cancer patients: a multicenter study of the Urooncology Association.

Authors:  Fuat Kızılay; Serdar Çelik; Sinan Sözen; Bora Özveren; Saadettin Eskiçorapçı; Mahir Özgen; Haluk Özen; Bülent Akdoğan; Güven Aslan; Fehmi Narter; Çağ Çal; Levent Türkeri
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-02-08

Review 8.  The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Hai Huang; Xiu-Wu Pan; Dan-Feng Xu; Xin-Gang Cui; Jie Chen; Yi Hong; Yi Gao; Lei Yin; Jian-Qing Ye; Lin Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Prognostic significance of six clinicopathological features for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haoran Liu; Hui Zhou; Libin Yan; Tao Ye; Hongyan Lu; Xifeng Sun; Zhangqun Ye; Hua Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-06

10.  Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Zhenpeng Lian; Hongtuan Zhang; Zhaowei He; Shenfei Ma; Xiaoming Wang; Ranlu Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.