| Literature DB >> 21660143 |
Shi-Hai Xing1, Xin-Bo Guo, Quan Wang, Qi-Fang Pan, Yue-Sheng Tian, Pin Liu, Jing-Ya Zhao, Guo-Feng Wang, Xiao-Fen Sun, Ke-Xuan Tang.
Abstract
The tetraploid plants of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don was obtained by colchicine induction from seeds explants, and the ploidy of the plants was identified by flow cytometry. The optimal treatment is 0.2% colchicine solution treated for 24 hours, and the induction rate reaches up to 30%. Comparing with morphological characteristics and growth habits between tetraploids and the control, we found that tetraploids of C. roseus had larger stoma and more branches and leaves. HPLC analysis showed tetraploidization could increase the contents of terpenoid indole alkaloids in C. roseus. Thus, tetraploidization could be used to produce higher alkaloids lines for commercial use. QRT-PCR results showed that the expression of enzymes involved in terpenoid indole alkaloids biosynthesis pathway had increased in the tetraploid plants. To our knowledge, this was the first paper to explore the secondary metabolism in autotetraploid C. roseus induced by colchicine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21660143 PMCID: PMC3110335 DOI: 10.1155/2011/793198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Figure 1TIAs biosynthetic pathway and relative genes in C. roseus. Unbroken arrows indicate single enzymatic conversions and broken arrows indicate multiple enzymatic steps.
Effect of direct application of colchicine solutions on the seeds of C. roseus and the number of tetraploid plants regenerated (50 seeds for each treatment).
| Concentration (%) | Time (hours) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 24 | 36 | 48 | |
| 0 | 0 (50) | 0 (50) | 0 (50) | 0 (50) |
| 0.05 | 0 (50) | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 5 (50) |
| 0.1 | 3 (50) | 7 (50) | 9 (50) | 3 (50) |
| 0.2 | 8 (50) | 15 (50) | 12 (50) | 5 (50) |
| 0.3 | 11 (50) | 7 (50) | 3 (50) | 0 (50) |
| 0.4 | 0 (50) | 0 (50) | 0 (50) | 0 (50) |
Genes and their primer sequences used for real-time PCR.
| accession no. (gene) | Primers | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Amplicon length (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM236089.1 ( | rtprx1-f | TAGCTCAAACAACTCGGCCACC | 195 | 62 |
| rtprx1-r | GCAGCACTGATGAATCGCACC | |||
| AJ250008.1 ( | rtas | GGCGGCGAAGCATGGGAACT | 329 | 59 |
| rtas | CCTCGGTCCGCTGG GGTTTC | |||
| X69791.1 ( | rtcpr-f | TCGGCCCTGGTACTGGACTAGC | 306 | 65 |
| rtcpr-r | TGGCATCACCGCAGACGTAAAC | |||
| L10081.1 | rtsls-f | CTGCCAGCTTTTGCCATATGC | 191 | 60 |
| rtsls-r | GAGTCCATGAGTTCTTCAATAG | |||
| M25151.1 ( | rttdc-f | TCGGCATCTCACCTCAAGTTCT | 207 | 60 |
| rttdc-r | TCGGGACATATACAGGCGCTT | |||
| U71605.1 ( | rtd4h-f | TTATGATCGAAAAAGTGAATTA | 223 | 58 |
| rtd4h-r | TTTCTTGATGATCTGAGTGCGT | |||
| AF053307.1 ( | rtdat-f | CTTCTTCTCATCACGTACCAACTC | 172 | 60 |
| rtdat-r | ATACCAAACTCAACGGCCTTAG | |||
| X53602.1 ( | rtstr-f | GCCTTCACCTTCGATTCAACTG | 287 | 62 |
| rtstr-r | GTGGCTAGTTGTGTGGCATACC | |||
| AJ251269.1 ( | rtg10h-f | ATAGCCAGAGCGGAGAAGCG | 163 | 55 |
| rtg10h-r | TTTCCCCGCCTCAACCATTA | |||
| AJ251249.1 ( | rtocar3-f | CCGGACCCGTTAGAGTAAACC | 212 | 58 |
| rtoca3-r | CGTCTCTTCTTCCTTCCTCCAC | |||
| AJ749993.1 ( | rtrsp9-f | GCGTTTGGATGCTGAGTTGAAG | 257 | 62 |
| rtrsp9-r | GGCGCTCAAGGAAGTTCTCTAC |
Figure 2Histogram of the relative fluorescence intensity of nuclei isolated from the leaves of diploid and tetraploid C. roseus plant. (a) The control diploid plant of C. roseus and (b) a tetraploid plant of C. roseus.
Two dimension variance analysis of different time and concentration of colchicine treatments on C. roseus tetraploid plants production.
| Sources of variation | Sum of square | Freedom | MS mean square | Critical value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration | 0.029883 | 5 | 0.005976 | 5.757** | |
| Time | 0.001933 | 3 | 0.000644 | 0.62– | |
| Random error | 0.015572 | 15 | 0.001038 | ||
| Total variation | 0.186133 | 23 |
Difference of leaf traits between diploid and tetraploid of C. roseus.
| Parameters | Diploids | Tetraploids |
|---|---|---|
| 43.82 ± 1.91a | 38.96 ± 2.52b | |
| 23.71 ± 1.83a | 28.26 ± 2.51b | |
| 17.11 ± 1.84a | 20.35 ± 1.80b | |
| 320.58 ± 51.33a | 451.56 ± 56.32b | |
| 1.24 ± 0.02a | 1.76 ± 0.01b |
Different letters (as (a) and (b) in the table) in the same row indicate significant statistical difference P < .05, *indicate P < .5 (ANOVA).
Figure 3Stomata in abaxial leaf epidermis under fluorescence microscope of diploid (a) and tetraploid (b) of C. roseus. Scale bar is 19.48 μm.
Figure 4Difference of the average content of TIAs alkaloids among tetraploid plants and controls in C. roseus.
Figure 5Quantitative real-time PCR analysis for the expression of ten genes in five tetraploid lines and three diploid lines which were also treated with colchicine solution in C. roseus. The average value relative expression of the controls was set to 1 level. The genes analyzed are Orca3 (a), As (b), Tdc (c), G10h (d), Sls (e), Cpr (f), Str (g), D4h (h), Dat (i), and CrPrx1 (j). The data of each line represented is average value of three replicates in each experiment, while the data of control represented is average value of three independent control plants with three replicates in each experiment.