Literature DB >> 21659931

Perception threshold for tilt.

Maurice Janssen1, Marc Lauvenberg, Wesley van der Ven, Twan Bloebaum, Herman Kingma.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the thresholds for perception of tilt and translation using 3 motion/tilt profile paradigms. Healthy subjects were submitted to the following: 1) unilateral and bilateral eccentric rotations (centrifugation), 2) whole body translatory decelerations opposite to the movement direction while seated on a linear sled, and 3) discrete slow velocity platform tilts. Subjects were instructed to verbally indicate the perceived direction of tilt or translation. Fifteen healthy subjects (12 male and 3 female subjects, 18-31 yr) without any history or evidence of any ophthalmologic or neuro-otologic disorder participated in this study. Our results from unilateral centrifugation indicate a threshold for body tilt perception of approximately 2 degrees with a substantial interindividual range (1.9-5.6 degrees, 52% interindividual and 34% intraindividual variability), which, to our interpretation, mainly depends on otolithic function. Tilt perception during whole body decelerations and discrete platform tilts mainly depends on somatosensory information, showing the dominant role of the somatosensory system for the perception of body orientation. Thus, tilt sensations during eccentric rotations seems to be a promising tool for the evaluation of utricular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21659931     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821c6c7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Vestibular implantation and longitudinal electrical stimulation of the semicircular canal afferents in human subjects.

Authors:  James O Phillips; Leo Ling; Kaibao Nie; Elyse Jameyson; Christopher M Phillips; Amy L Nowack; Justin S Golub; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Roll aftereffects: influence of tilt and inter-stimulus interval.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual and vestibular perceptual thresholds each demonstrate better precision at specific frequencies and also exhibit optimal integration.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Koeun Lim; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Perception of rotation, path, and heading in circular trajectories.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Alessandro Nesti; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Paolo Pretto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Jerome Carriot; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Reported thresholds of self-motion perception are influenced by testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Pleshkov; N Rondas; F Lucieer; L van Stiphout; M Janssen; N Guinand; A Perez-Fornos; V Demkin; V van Rompaey; H Kingma; R van de Berg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.682

Review 8.  New Frontiers in Managing the Dizzy Patient.

Authors:  Desi P Schoo; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 1.866

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.