BACKGROUND: Blood centers are interested in understanding determinants of frequent blood donation. We hypothesized that participation in uncompensated research could result in higher donation rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donation rates for 2425 subjects from six US blood centers enrolled in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II Donor Iron Status Evaluation Study were compared to those of nonenrolled donors (n = 202,383). Over 15 months, we compared mean donation rates and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) between enrolled and nonenrolled for three subgroups, first-time, reactivated, and frequent donors, and donation rates before and after the study enrollment period for frequent donors only. RESULTS: Enrolled donors had higher 15-month mean donation rates than nonenrolled donors (first-time, 1.21 [RR = 1.91]; reactivated, 1.68 [RR = 1.83]; frequent, 3.40 [RR = 1.12]). However, frequent donors donated at approximately the same rate after enrollment as they did before enrollment in the study (3.62 per 15 months [RR = 1.12]). CONCLUSION: Donors enrolled in the study donated at a higher rate than nonenrolled donors, but frequent donors remained consistent in their donation frequency both before and after enrollment. Although increased donation rates could have been causally related to study enrollment, we cannot rule out an enrollment bias whereby more committed donors were more likely to enroll in the study.
BACKGROUND: Blood centers are interested in understanding determinants of frequent blood donation. We hypothesized that participation in uncompensated research could result in higher donation rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donation rates for 2425 subjects from six US blood centers enrolled in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II DonorIron Status Evaluation Study were compared to those of nonenrolled donors (n = 202,383). Over 15 months, we compared mean donation rates and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) between enrolled and nonenrolled for three subgroups, first-time, reactivated, and frequent donors, and donation rates before and after the study enrollment period for frequent donors only. RESULTS: Enrolled donors had higher 15-month mean donation rates than nonenrolled donors (first-time, 1.21 [RR = 1.91]; reactivated, 1.68 [RR = 1.83]; frequent, 3.40 [RR = 1.12]). However, frequent donors donated at approximately the same rate after enrollment as they did before enrollment in the study (3.62 per 15 months [RR = 1.12]). CONCLUSION: Donors enrolled in the study donated at a higher rate than nonenrolled donors, but frequent donors remained consistent in their donation frequency both before and after enrollment. Although increased donation rates could have been causally related to study enrollment, we cannot rule out an enrollment bias whereby more committed donors were more likely to enroll in the study.
Authors: Y Wu; S A Glynn; G B Schreiber; D J Wright; A Lo; E L Murphy; S H Kleinman; G Garratty Journal: Transfusion Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: G B Schreiber; U K Sharma; D J Wright; S A Glynn; H E Ownby; Y Tu; G Garratty; J Piliavin; T Zuck; R Gilcher Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: George B Schreiber; Karen S Schlumpf; Simone A Glynn; David J Wright; Yongling Tu; Melissa R King; Martha J Higgins; Debra Kessler; Ronald Gilcher; Catharie C Nass; Anne M Guiltinan Journal: Transfusion Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Whitney Randolph Steele; George B Schreiber; Anne Guiltinan; Catharie Nass; Simone A Glynn; David J Wright; Debra Kessler; Karen S Schlumpf; Yongling Tu; James W Smith; George Garratty Journal: Transfusion Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Karen S Schlumpf; Simone A Glynn; George B Schreiber; David J Wright; Whitney Randolph Steele; Yongling Tu; Sigurd Hermansen; Martha J Higgins; George Garratty; Edward L Murphy Journal: Transfusion Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Simone A Glynn; Alan E Williams; Catharie C Nass; James Bethel; Debra Kessler; Edward P Scott; Joy Fridey; Steven H Kleinman; George B Schreiber Journal: Transfusion Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ritchard G Cable; Simone A Glynn; Joseph E Kiss; Alan E Mast; Whitney R Steele; Edward L Murphy; David J Wright; Ronald A Sacher; Jerry L Gottschall; Leslie H Tobler; Toby L Simon Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Simon G Thompson; Stephen Kaptoge; Carmel Moore; Matthew Walker; Jane Armitage; Willem H Ouwehand; David J Roberts; John Danesh Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Muriel Lobier; Pia Niittymäki; Nina Nikiforow; Elina Palokangas; Antti Larjo; Pirkko Mattila; Johanna Castrén; Jukka Partanen; Mikko Arvas Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 2.144