BACKGROUND: New regulatory requirements for donor eligibility challenge blood centers to recruit and retain enough donors. This study evaluated correlations between overall satisfaction with the donation process and donor demographics and the effect of both on a donor's intent to return. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was given to donors at multiple sites of one blood center over a 3-week period. First-time and repeat donors were asked questions on demographic characteristics, satisfaction with the current donation process, motivation for current and future donations, and intent to return. RESULTS: More than 75 percent of donors rated the overall donation process at 9 or 10 on a scale of 10 (mean, 9.19; standard deviation, 1.09), with female, high school-educated, and first-time donors giving higher satisfaction ratings than male, college-educated, and repeat donors, respectively (all p < 0.001). Donor satisfaction was correlated with intent to return for another donation (p = 0.002). For the current donation, donors rated altruistic motivations most highly. Medical testing was the most highly rated incentive for future donations, followed by frequent donor programs and convenient donation times and locations; preferences varied by demographic subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Blood donor satisfaction varies among demographic and donation history subgroups and is positively correlated with the intent to return for future donation. Although the primary motivation among all donors was altruism, incentives to future donation may need to be tailored according to demographic subgroups.
BACKGROUND: New regulatory requirements for donor eligibility challenge blood centers to recruit and retain enough donors. This study evaluated correlations between overall satisfaction with the donation process and donor demographics and the effect of both on a donor's intent to return. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was given to donors at multiple sites of one blood center over a 3-week period. First-time and repeat donors were asked questions on demographic characteristics, satisfaction with the current donation process, motivation for current and future donations, and intent to return. RESULTS: More than 75 percent of donors rated the overall donation process at 9 or 10 on a scale of 10 (mean, 9.19; standard deviation, 1.09), with female, high school-educated, and first-time donors giving higher satisfaction ratings than male, college-educated, and repeat donors, respectively (all p < 0.001). Donor satisfaction was correlated with intent to return for another donation (p = 0.002). For the current donation, donors rated altruistic motivations most highly. Medical testing was the most highly rated incentive for future donations, followed by frequent donor programs and convenient donation times and locations; preferences varied by demographic subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Blood donor satisfaction varies among demographic and donation history subgroups and is positively correlated with the intent to return for future donation. Although the primary motivation among all donors was altruism, incentives to future donation may need to be tailored according to demographic subgroups.
Authors: Simone A Glynn; Steven H Kleinman; George B Schreiber; Thomas Zuck; Suzanne Mc Combs; James Bethel; George Garratty; Alan E Williams Journal: Transfusion Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: George B Schreiber; Simone A Glynn; Mark A Damesyn; David J Wright; Yongling Tu; Roger Y Dodd; Edward L Murphy Journal: Transfusion Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: George B Schreiber; Karen S Schlumpf; Simone A Glynn; David J Wright; Yongling Tu; Melissa R King; Martha J Higgins; Debra Kessler; Ronald Gilcher; Catharie C Nass; Anne M Guiltinan Journal: Transfusion Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Simone A Glynn; Alan E Williams; Catharie C Nass; James Bethel; Debra Kessler; Edward P Scott; Joy Fridey; Steven H Kleinman; George B Schreiber Journal: Transfusion Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Patricia M Carey; Patrick M High; Karen S Schlumpf; Bryce R Johnson; Alan E Mast; Jorge A Rios; Toby L Simon; Susan L Wilkinson Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Tjeerd W Piersma; René Bekkers; Elisabeth F Klinkenberg; Wim L A M De Kort; Eva-Maria Merz Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Cesar de Almeida Neto; Alfredo Mendrone; Brian Custer; Jing Liu; Anna Bárbara Carneiro-Proietti; Silvana A Carneiro Leão; David J Wright; Edward L Murphy; Ester Cerdeira Sabino Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Anna Bárbara Carneiro-Proietti; Ester C Sabino; Divaldo Sampaio; Fernando A Proietti; Thelma T Gonçalez; Cláudia D L Oliveira; João E Ferreira; Jing Liu; Brian Custer; George B Schreiber; Edward L Murphy; Michael P Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 3.157