Literature DB >> 21657823

Design of built environments to accommodate mobility scooter users: part II.

Emily C King1, Tilak Dutta, Susan M Gorski, Pamela J Holliday, Geoff R Fernie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE.Accessibility standards for wheeled mobility devices currently use a 1.5 m turning circle, designed to accommodate manual wheelchairs. Scooters are less manoeuvrable than wheelchairs, so allowing a full turning circle would require too much space. Instead, we propose using a rectangle that provides space for a three-point turn. Here, we determine the area requirements of this approach. METHOD. For rectangular 'rooms' of varying aspect ratios, we measured the minimum dimensions in which two four-wheeled scooters (the Celebrity-X and Fortress-1700), which combine good outdoor performance with reasonable indoor manoeuvrability, could enter the space, perform a three-point turn and exit. Moveable Styrofoam walls defined each 'room', and a doorway was located either near the corner of the space or in the middle of one wall. 'Room' size was decreased until our expert driver could no longer perform the manoeuvre. RESULTS. Compared to the area required for a turning circle, 42-54% savings were achieved. Relative to existing requirements, 53-95% more space is required to accommodate the Celebrity-X; 173-223% increases are necessary for the Fortress-1700. CONCLUSIONS. When accommodating four-wheeled scooters, our proposed three-point turn definition would require more space than the current standards, but considerably less than if a full turning circle were used.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21657823     DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.549898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  3 in total

1.  Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.

Authors:  Clive D'Souza; Victor L Paquet; James A Lenker; Edward Steinfeld
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2017-11-13

Review 2.  Motorized mobility scooters: the use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults - a mini-review.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Matthew Bunting; Carol Howe; Jane Mohler; Jonathan Sprinkle; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.140

3.  Mobility scooters in urban environments: A research agenda.

Authors:  Michal Isaacson; Dov Barkay
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2020-08-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.