Literature DB >> 24481257

Motorized mobility scooters: the use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults - a mini-review.

Nima Toosizadeh1, Matthew Bunting, Carol Howe, Jane Mohler, Jonathan Sprinkle, Bijan Najafi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motorized mobility scooters (MMS) have become the most acceptable powered assistive device for those with impaired mobility, who have sufficient upper body strength and dexterity, and postural stability. Although several benefits have been attributed to MMS usage, there are likewise risks of use, including injuries and even deaths.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current review was to summarize results from clinical studies regarding the enhancement of MMS driver safety with a primary focus on improving driving skills/performance using clinical approaches. We addressed three main objectives: (1) to identify and summarize any available evidence (strong, moderate, or weak evidence based on the quality of studies) regarding improved driving skills/performance following training/intervention; (2) to identify types of driving skills/performance that might be improved by training/intervention, and (3) to identify the use of technology in improving MMS performance or training procedure.
METHODS: Articles were searched for in the following medical and engineering electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, EI Compendix, IEEE Explore, and REHABDATA. Inclusion criteria included: aging adults or those with ambulatory problems, intervention or targeted training, and clinical trial. Outcomes included: MMS skills/performance.
RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria and are analyzed in this review. Four of the six articles contained training approaches for MMS drivers including skill trainings using real MMS inside and outside (i.e. in the community) and in a 3D virtual environment. The other two studies contain infrastructural assessments (i.e. the minimum space required for safe maneuverability of MMS users) and additional mobility assistance tools to improve maneuverability and to enhance driving performance.
CONCLUSIONS: RESULTS from the current review showed improved driving skills/performance by training, infrastructural assessments, and incorporating mobility assistance tools. MMS driving skills that can be improved through driver training include: weaving, negotiating with and avoiding pedestrian interference, simultaneous reading of signs and obstacle avoidance in path, level driving, forward and reverse driving, figure 8s, turning in place, crossing left slope, maneuvering down a 2-inch curb, and driving up and down inclines. However, several limitations exist in the available literature regarding evidence of improved driving skills/performance following training/intervention, such as small sample sizes, lack of control groups and statistical analysis.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481257      PMCID: PMC4074432          DOI: 10.1159/000356766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  26 in total

1.  Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Louise Demers; Isabelle Gélinas; William C Miller; Jeffrey W Jutai; Luc Noreau
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Design features that affect the maneuverability of wheelchairs and scooters.

Authors:  Alicia M Koontz; Eric D Brindle; Padmaja Kankipati; David Feathers; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Nitz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-12-11

Review 4.  Powered mobility for middle-aged and older adults: systematic review of outcomes and appraisal of published evidence.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Louise Demers; Isabelle Gélinas; Jeffrey Jutai; Marcus J Fuhrer; Frank DeRuyter
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Wheelchair safety--adverse reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  R L Kirby; S A Ackroyd-Stolarz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Effect of motorized scooters on quality of life and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Brian W Zagol; Richard A Krasuski
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Age-related driving disorders: screening in hospitals and outpatients settings.

Authors:  Sara Baird; Linda Hill; Jill Rybar; Susanna Concha-Garcia; Raul Coimbra; Kevin Patrick
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.730

8.  Development of a community mobility skills course for people who use mobility devices.

Authors:  Kimberly A Walker; Kerri A Morgan; Carrie L Morris; Keri K DeGroot; Holly H Hollingsworth; David B Gray
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

9.  An electric scooter simulation program for training the driving skills of stroke patients with mobility problems: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michiel J A Jannink; C Victorien Erren-Wolters; Alexander C de Kort; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2008-12

10.  Incidence of golf cart-related injury in the United States.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Jonathan T Zoghby; Russell Griffin; Loring W Rue
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Outdoor motivation moderates the effects of accessibility on mobility in old age.

Authors:  Stefan T Kamin; Anja Beyer; Frieder R Lang
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Estimation of Steering and Throttle Angles of a Motorized Mobility Scooter with Inertial Measurement Units for Continuous Quantification of Driving Operation.

Authors:  Jun Suzurikawa; Shunsuke Kurokawa; Haruki Sugiyama; Kazunori Hase
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  A participatory approach to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment tool.

Authors:  Deepan C Kamaraj; Brad E Dicianno; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.