Literature DB >> 21656741

Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with contemporary targeted therapy.

Daniel Y C Heng1, Wanling Xie, Georg A Bjarnason, Ulka Vaishampayan, Min-Han Tan, Jennifer Knox, Frede Donskov, Lori Wood, Christian Kollmannsberger, Brian I Rini, Toni K Choueiri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) clinical trials that examined targeted agents used progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. Whether PFS can be used as a predictor of overall survival (OS) is unknown.
METHODS: Patients from 12 cancer centers who received targeted therapy for mRCC were identified. Landmark analyses for progression at 3 months and 6 months after drug initiation were performed to minimize lead-time bias. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the utility of PFS for predicting OS.
RESULTS: In total, 1158 patients were included. The median follow-up was 30.6 months, the median age was 60 years, and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. For the entire cohort, the median PFS was 7.6 months, and the median OS was 19.7 months. In the landmark analysis, the median OS for patients who progressed at 3 months was 7.8 months compared with 23.6 months for patients who did not progress (log-rank test; P < .0001). Similarly, for patients who progressed at 6 months, the median OS was 8.6 months compared with 26 months for patients who did not progress (P < .0001). Compared with those who did not progress, for the patients who progressed at 3 months and at 6 months, the hazard ratios for death adjusted for adverse prognostic factors were 3.05 (95% confidence interval, 2.42-3.84) and 2.96 (95% confidence interval, 2.39-3.67), respectively. Similar results were demonstrated with landmark analyses at 9 months and at 12 months and in the bootstrap validation. Kendall tau rank correlation and a Fleischer model demonstrated a statistically significant dependent correlation.
CONCLUSIONS: PFS at 3 months and at 6 months predicted OS, and the current results indicated that PFS may be a meaningful intermediate endpoint for OS in patients with mRCC who receive treatment with novel agents.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21656741      PMCID: PMC3856357          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

Review 1.  Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Patricia A Tang; Søren M Bentzen; Eric X Chen; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A statistical model for the dependence between progression-free survival and overall survival.

Authors:  Frank Fleischer; Birgit Gaschler-Markefski; Erich Bluhmki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Nicholas J Vogelzang; San-San Ou; Kouros Owzar; Laura Archer; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa compared with interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: CALGB 90206.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Susan Halabi; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Walter M Stadler; Daniel A Vaena; San-San Ou; Laura Archer; James N Atkins; Joel Picus; Piotr Czaykowski; Janice Dutcher; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Roberto Pili; Georg A Bjarnason; Xavier Garcia-del-Muro; Jeffrey A Sosman; Ewa Solska; George Wilding; John A Thompson; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Xin Huang; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Stéphane Oudard; Thomas E Hutson; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Viktor Grünwald; John A Thompson; Robert A Figlin; Norbert Hollaender; Gladys Urbanowitz; William J Berg; Andrea Kay; David Lebwohl; Alain Ravaud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Role of randomized phase III trials in an era of effective targeted therapies.

Authors:  Manish R Sharma; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Progression-free survival as a clinical trial endpoint in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S J Hotte; G A Bjarnason; D Y C Heng; M A S Jewett; A Kapoor; C Kollmannsberger; J Maroun; L A Mayhew; S North; M N Reaume; J D Ruether; D Soulieres; P M Venner; E W Winquist; L Wood; J H E Yong; F Saad
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Progression-free survival of first-line treatment with molecular-targeted therapy may be a meaningful intermediate endpoint for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Takuya Yamashita; Shuhei Kusano; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-13

4.  Carbonic anhydrase IX as a potential biomarker of efficacy in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib or placebo: analysis from the treatment approaches in renal cancer global evaluation trial (TARGET).

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Suchun Cheng; Angela Q Qu; Jaromir Pastorek; Michael B Atkins; Sabina Signoretti
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Angiotensin system inhibitors and outcome of sunitinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective examination.

Authors:  Daniel Keizman; Peng Huang; Mario A Eisenberger; Roberto Pili; Jenny J Kim; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hans Hammers; Michael A Carducci
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina Suárez; Marc Campayo; Romà Bastús; Sergi Castillo; Olatz Etxanitz; Marta Guix; Núria Sala; Enrique Gallardo
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 8.  Current treatment considerations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Housam Haddad; Brian I Rini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-06

9.  Efficacy of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the elderly patient population.

Authors:  Husain K Khambati; Toni K Choueiri; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Scott North; George A Bjarnason; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Lori Wood; Jennifer J Knox; Min-Han Tan; Mary J MacKenzie; Frede Donskov; Brian I Rini; Daniel Y C Heng
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Brian Rini; Bernard Escudier; Walter M Stadler; Eric J Small
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.