Literature DB >> 21656658

Social barriers to listing for adult liver transplantation: their prevalence and association with program characteristics.

Anna Flattau1, Manhal Olaywi, Paul J Gaglio, Paula Marcus, Paul Meissner, Emily B L Dorfman, John F Reinus.   

Abstract

Social barriers to effective medical care are mandated to be routinely assessed as part of an evaluation for liver transplantation. This study explores how frequently liver transplant programs encounter these barriers in patients undergoing an evaluation and whether programs with higher proportions of Medicaid patients, historically disadvantaged minority patients, and rural patients encounter social barriers more frequently. A survey for assessing patient demographics and social barriers was electronically completed by representatives of 61 of 104 eligible US adult liver transplant programs (59%). Fifty-eight of the 61 programs identified themselves, and their characteristics were similar to those of all 104 US programs according to publicly available data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Social barriers were reported to be encountered sometimes (10%-30%) or frequently (>30%) by the 61 programs as follows: inadequate or unstable health insurance (68.9% of the programs), a chaotic social environment (63.9%), a lack of a care partner (60.7%), an inability to obtain transportation (49.2%), a low educational level (36.1%), inadequate housing (23.0%), a language barrier (19.7%), no reliable way of contacting the patient (16.4%), difficulty in obtaining child care (11.5%), and food insecurity (8.2%). The frequencies of perceived social barriers did not differ significantly between programs reporting higher or lower proportions of Medicaid, minority, or rural patients. Our analysis suggests that program-level operational planning for addressing social barriers to transplant listing should be considered regardless of the proportions of Medicaid-insured, racial or ethnic minority, and rural patients in the population.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656658     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

1.  Change in Health Insurance Coverage After Liver Transplantation Can Be Associated with Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Clifford Akateh; Dmitry Tumin; Eliza W Beal; Khalid Mumtaz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Excluding patients from transplant due to social support: Results from a national survey of transplant providers.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Kelsey Berry; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle; Douglas W Hanto
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  County-level Differences in Liver-related Mortality, Waitlisting, and Liver Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Robert M Cannon; Ariann Nassel; Jeffery T Walker; Saulat S Sheikh; Babak J Orandi; Malay B Shah; Raymond J Lynch; David S Goldberg; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 4.  Social determinants of health data in solid organ transplantation: National data sources and future directions.

Authors:  Norine W Chan; Mary Moya-Mendez; Jacqueline B Henson; Hamed Zaribafzadeh; Mark P Sendak; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Suresh Balu; Allan D Kirk; Lisa M McElroy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 9.369

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.