UNLABELLED: About 75% of patients suffering from osteoporosis are not diagnosed. This study describes a multi-site bone ultrasound method for osteoporosis diagnostics. In comparison with axial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the ultrasound method showed good diagnostic performance and could discriminate fracture subjects among elderly females. INTRODUCTION: Axial DXA, the gold standard diagnostic method for osteoporosis, predicts fractures only moderately. At present, no reliable diagnostic methods are available at the primary health care level. Here, a multi-site ultrasound method is proposed for osteoporosis diagnostics. METHODS: Thirty elderly women were examined using the ultrasound backscatter measurements in proximal femur, proximal radius, proximal and distal tibia in vivo. First, we predicted the areal bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck by ultrasound measurements in tibia combined with specific subject characteristics (density index, DI) and, second, we tested the ability of ultrasound backscatter measurements at proximal femur to discriminate between individuals with previously fractured hips from those without fractures. Areal BMD was determined by axial DXA. RESULTS: Combined ultrasound parameters, cortical thickness at distal and proximal tibia, with age and weight of the subject, provided a significant estimate of BMD(neck) (r = 0.86, p < 0.001, n = 30). When inserted into FRAX (World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool), the DI indicated the same treatment proposal as the BMD(neck) with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The receiver operating characteristic analyses, with a combination of ultrasound parameters and patient characteristics, discriminated fracture subjects from the controls similarly as the model combining BMD(neck) and patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, ultrasound backscatter measurements of proximal femur were conducted in vivo. The results indicate that ultrasound parameters, combined with patient characteristics, may provide a means for osteoporosis diagnostics.
UNLABELLED: About 75% of patients suffering from osteoporosis are not diagnosed. This study describes a multi-site bone ultrasound method for osteoporosis diagnostics. In comparison with axial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the ultrasound method showed good diagnostic performance and could discriminate fracture subjects among elderly females. INTRODUCTION: Axial DXA, the gold standard diagnostic method for osteoporosis, predicts fractures only moderately. At present, no reliable diagnostic methods are available at the primary health care level. Here, a multi-site ultrasound method is proposed for osteoporosis diagnostics. METHODS: Thirty elderly women were examined using the ultrasound backscatter measurements in proximal femur, proximal radius, proximal and distal tibia in vivo. First, we predicted the areal bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck by ultrasound measurements in tibia combined with specific subject characteristics (density index, DI) and, second, we tested the ability of ultrasound backscatter measurements at proximal femur to discriminate between individuals with previously fractured hips from those without fractures. Areal BMD was determined by axial DXA. RESULTS: Combined ultrasound parameters, cortical thickness at distal and proximal tibia, with age and weight of the subject, provided a significant estimate of BMD(neck) (r = 0.86, p < 0.001, n = 30). When inserted into FRAX (World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool), the DI indicated the same treatment proposal as the BMD(neck) with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The receiver operating characteristic analyses, with a combination of ultrasound parameters and patient characteristics, discriminated fracture subjects from the controls similarly as the model combining BMD(neck) and patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, ultrasound backscatter measurements of proximal femur were conducted in vivo. The results indicate that ultrasound parameters, combined with patient characteristics, may provide a means for osteoporosis diagnostics.
Authors: B K Hoffmeister; D P Johnson; J A Janeski; D A Keedy; B W Steinert; A M Viano; S C Kaste Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Alireza Moayyeri; Stephen Kaptoge; Nichola Dalzell; Sheila Bingham; Robert N Luben; Nicholas J Wareham; Jonathan Reeve; Kay Tee Khaw Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Brent K Hoffmeister; Ann M Viano; Jinsong Huang; Luke C Fairbanks; Sheldon C Ebron; Joshua T Moore; Jordan P Ankersen; Matthew T Huber; Abel A Diaz Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Brent K Hoffmeister; Ann M Viano; Luke C Fairbanks; Sheldon C Ebron; Joseph A McPherson; Matthew T Huber Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 1.840