Literature DB >> 21656072

Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic versus open colon surgery in a tertiary care center.

Nawar A Alkhamesi1, Janet Martin, Christopher M Schlachta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-world cost analysis of elective laparoscopic versus open colon resection in a tertiary Canadian teaching hospital was performed to evaluate the financial impact of minimally invasive surgery with the appointment of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon in a single-payer system.
METHODS: A retrospective review of elective laparoscopic and open segmental colectomies (2005-2010) was performed. Combined cases and procedures performed for inpatients were excluded to minimize cost variation. The hospital case-costing system was used to calculate the hourly cost of operating room time and the daily hospital ward stay. The cost of disposable equipment was calculated manually. A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the hospital perspective, which excludes physician payment. Cases were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
RESULTS: For this study, 470 right-side colectomies (322 open and 148 laparoscopic) and 266 left-side colectomies (181 open and 85 laparoscopic) were found to match the inclusion criteria. The operating room time was longer for the laparoscopic procedures than for the open procedures: 203.4 versus 173.4 min (P = 0.1) for right and extended right hemicolectomy (RC) and 287.4 versus 173.4 min (P = 0.009) for left and sigmoid colectomy (LC). This resulted in higher operating room costs: $4,094.10 versus $3312.11 for RC and $5,784.88 versus $4,582.55 for LC. The median hospital stay for an index admission was shorter for both sides: 5 days versus 8 days (P = 0.01) for RC and 4 days versus 6 days (P = 0.04). This resulted in lower ward costs: $4,556.07 versus $6,632.82 for RC and $3,297.24 versus $5,949.09 for LC. The cost of care per index admission after laparoscopic versus open resection was $10,097.93 versus $10,444.69 for RC and $11,067.72 versus. $11,146.56 for LC. The introduction of laparoscopic surgery has saved our institution $58,021.43 over 5 years.
CONCLUSION: The reasons for observed differences in operating room time and length of hospital stay were uncontrolled and may be multifactorial. However, the results demonstrate that adopting a laparoscopic approach for elective colon surgery resulted in progressive financial savings.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656072     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1765-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  M Rawlins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  J R Bessell; P Baxter; P Riddell; S Watkin; G J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; G Ramsay; G Sunderland; J N Baxter; J R Anderson; D Galloway; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  A cost-analysis comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: the McMaster Institute of Urology experience.

Authors:  Tariq F Al-Shaiji; Niki Kanaroglou; Achilleas Thom; Connie Prowse; Vikram Comondore; William Orovan; Kevin Piercey; Paul Whelan; Leo Winter; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R A Hernández; R M de Verteuil; C M Fraser; L D Vale
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Valentina Ferri; Federica Gonella; Roberto Cirocchi; Mario Morino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Omar Hyder; Adil H Haider; Melissa Camp; Anne Lidor; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  A cost comparison of laparoscopic and open colon surgery in a publicly funded academic institution.

Authors:  Krista M Hardy; Josephine Kwong; Kristen B Pitzul; Ashley S Vergis; Timothy D Jackson; David R Urbach; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.

Authors:  M Zimmermann; C Benecke; C Jung; M Hoffmann; J Nolde; E Schlöricke; H P Bruch; T Keck; T Laubert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Karl-Frederik Meyer; Thomas Jungbluth; Uwe-Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schlöricke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy in colon carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of the DGAV StuDoQ|ColonCancer registry.

Authors:  Christian Jurowich; Sven Lichthardt; Caroline Kastner; Imme Haubitz; Andre Prock; Jörg Filser; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Utilization of Laparoscopic Colon Surgery in the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (PUDF).

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp; William Klingsporn; Brittany Harper; Ira L Swinney; Christopher Dodoo; Brian Davis; Alan Tyroch
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  A cost-minimization analysis of first intention laparoscopic compared to open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Adam L Widdison; Victoria Barns; Oliver Prescott; Adam Pollard
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-19

10.  Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Sheng Li; Fan Chun Meng; Jun Kai Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.