Literature DB >> 21655386

Mode of administration bias.

Chad Cook1.   

Abstract

Year:  2010        PMID： 21655386      PMCID： PMC3101072          DOI： 10.1179/106698110X12640740712617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN： 1066-9817


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey.

Authors:  A Bowling; M Bond; C Jenkinson; D L Lamping
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Tutorials in clinical research: part IV: recognizing and controlling bias.

Authors:  James M Hartman; James W Forsen; Mark S Wallace; J Gail Neely
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  The reliability of self-assessed health status.

Authors:  Thomas F Crossley; Steven Kennedy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview.

Authors:  J Höher; T Bach; A Münster; B Bouillon; T Tiling
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Bias in using family history as a risk factor in case-control studies of disease.

Authors:  M J Khoury; W D Flanders
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Outcomes research in the AOSSM.

Authors:  R J Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202
View more
  40 in total

1.  Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test: a randomized study.

Authors:  Guilherme F da Silva; Maria Tereza A Morano; Maria Penha U Sales; Natalia B Olegário; Antonio George M Cavalcante; Eanes D B Pereira
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clinimetrics corner: the Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) poorly correlates with functional measures and is not temporally stable.

Authors:  Craig Garrison; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-11

3.  Profile of European adults interested in internet-based personalised nutrition: the Food4Me study.

Authors:  Katherine M Livingstone; Carlos Celis-Morales; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Clare B O'Donovan; Hannah Forster; Clara Woolhead; Cyril F M Marsaux; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Silvia Kolossa; Lydia Tsirigoti; Christina P Lambrinou; George Moschonis; Magdalena Godlewska; Agnieszka Surwiłło; Christian A Drevon; Yannis Manios; Iwona Traczyk; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Marianne C Walsh; Julie A Lovegrove; J Alfredo Martinez; Wim H Saris; Hannelore Daniel; Mike Gibney; John C Mathers
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  A comparison of telephone interview versus on-site completion of Lysholm knee score in patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: are the results equivalent?

Authors:  Ozkan Kose; Gokmen Deniz; Hakan Ozcan; Ferhat Guler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-31

5.  Five good reasons to be disappointed with randomized trials.

Authors:  Chad E Cook; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  Grassroots clinical research using crowdsourcing.

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

7.  Publication fraud, dishonesty, and deceit.

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

8.  A retrospective review of acupuncture use for the treatment of pain in sickle cell disease patients: descriptive analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Kit Lu; Mok-Chung Jennifer Cheng; Xiaoying Ge; Ann Berger; Dihua Xu; Gregory J Kato; Caterina P Minniti
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 9.  Anxiety prevalence following spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Le; D Dorstyn
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Survey mode influence on patient-reported outcome scores in orthopaedic surgery: telephone results may be positively biased.

Authors:  Jon E Hammarstedt; John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Kevin F Dunne; S Pavan Vemula; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.