Literature DB >> 20824704

Use of faecal markers in screening for colorectal neoplasia: a European group on tumor markers position paper.

Michael J Duffy1, Leo G M van Rossum, Sietze T van Turenhout, Outi Malminiemi, Catherine Sturgeon, Rolf Lamerz, Andrea Nicolini, Caj Haglund, Lubos Holubec, Callum G Fraser, Stephen P Halloran.   

Abstract

Several randomized controlled trials have shown that population-based screening using faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) can reduce mortality from colorectal neoplasia. Based on this evidence, a number of countries have introduced screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and high-risk adenoma and many others are considering its introduction. The aim of this article is to critically review the current status of faecal markers as population-based screening tests for these neoplasia. Most of the available faecal tests involve the measurement of either occult blood or a panel of DNA markers. Occult blood may be measured using either the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or a faecal immunochemical test (iFOBT). Although iFOBT may require a greater initial investment, they have several advantages over gFOBT, including greater analytical sensitivity and specificity. Their use results in improved clinical performance and higher uptake rates. Importantly for population screening, some of the iFOBTs can be automated and provide an adjustable cutoff for faecal haemoglobin concentration. However, samples for iFOBT, may be less stable after collection than for gFOBT. For new centres undertaking FOBT for colorectal neoplasia, the European Group on Tumour Markers recommends use of a quantitative iFOBT with an adjustable cutoff point and high throughput analysis. All participants with positive FOBT results should be offered colonoscopy. The panel recommends further research into increasing the stability of iFOBT and the development of improved and affordable DNA and proteomic-based tests, which reduce current false negative rates, simplify sample transport and enable automated analysis.
Copyright © 2010 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20824704     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  29 in total

1.  Small bowel evaluation in asymptomatic fecal immunochemical test-positive patients with a negative colonoscopy: is it necessary?

Authors:  Jae Jun Park; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Investigating for GI malignancy in iron-deficiency anaemia-the case for risk stratification.

Authors:  Jonathon Snook
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-12

Review 3.  A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: evidence lost in translation?

Authors:  K L Flitcroft; D J B St John; K Howard; S M Carter; M P Pignone; G P Salkeld; L J Trevena
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Pan-Canadian initiatives in colorectal cancer screening: adopting knowledge translation tools to accelerate uptake and impact.

Authors:  H E Bryant; S V Fekete; D H Major
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Role of Raman spectroscopy and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cerys A Jenkins; Paul D Lewis; Peter R Dunstan; Dean A Harris
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

7.  Application of quantitative estimates of fecal hemoglobin concentration for risk prediction of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Chao-Sheng Liao; Yu-Min Lin; Hung-Chuen Chang; Yu-Hung Chen; Lee-Won Chong; Chun-Hao Chen; Yueh-Shih Lin; Kuo-Ching Yang; Chia-Hui Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Results of National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Croatia (2007-2011).

Authors:  Miroslava Katičić; Nataša Antoljak; Milan Kujundžić; Valerija Stamenić; Dunja Skoko Poljak; Danica Kramarić; Davor Stimac; Marija Strnad Pešikan; Mirko Samija; Zdravko Ebling
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Serum metabolomics analysis for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Nobuaki Yagi; Katsura Mizushima; Yasuki Higashimura; Yasuko Hirai; Tetsuya Okayama; Naohisa Yoshida; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiro Kamada; Osamu Handa; Takeshi Ishikawa; Tomohisa Takagi; Hideyuki Konishi; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Eigo Otsuji; Yoshito Itoh; Yuji Naito
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 10.  Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Tanya Kadiyska; Alexander Nossikoff
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.