Literature DB >> 21654513

Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.

Gauti Jóhannesson1, Per Hallberg, Anders Eklund, Timo Koskela, Christina Lindén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate 3 tonometry methods--the gold standard, Goldmann applanation tonometry, a new method, Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (PDCT), and a method under development, applanation resonance tonometry (ART)--with respect to intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements before, 3 and 6 months after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One randomly assigned eye of each of 53 healthy individuals, who underwent LASEK surgery for myopia was studied. Visual acuity, central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and IOP were measured at each visit. Six IOP measurements/methods with 5 minutes pause between methods were performed.
RESULTS: All tonometry methods measured a significantly lower IOP after LASEK correction by a mean of -3.1 diopters. The IOP reduction was largest after 6 months for Goldmann applanation tonometry (-1.7 ± 1.8 mm Hg) followed by ARTstat (-1.2 ± 1.5 mm Hg), PDCT (-1.1 ± 1.6 mm Hg), and ARTdyn (-1.0 ± 1.5 mm Hg). The reduction of IOP did not differ significantly between different methods (P=0.11). There was a significant further reduction of measured IOP for PDCT between 3 and 6 months (-0.5 ± 1.0 mm Hg). Uncorrected visual acuity improved significantly between 3 and 6 months postoperatively from 1.32 ± 0.28 to 1.43 ± 0.27.
CONCLUSIONS: All tonometry methods measured a significant, but low, reduction of IOP 3 and 6 months after LASEK. Further change in visual acuity and IOP measurements between 3 and 6 months suggest a still ongoing postoperative process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21654513     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Age-dependency of ocular parameters: a cross sectional study of young and elderly healthy subjects.

Authors:  G Jóhannesson; P Hallberg; K Ambarki; A Eklund; C Lindén
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Can we trust intraocular pressure measurements in eyes with intracameral air?

Authors:  Gauti Jóhannesson; Christina Lindén; Anders Eklund; Anders Behndig; Per Hallberg
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann tonometry: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tal Yahalomi; Natalya Kovalyuk; Roee Arnon; Barak Hen; Joseph Pikkel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery.

Authors:  Shireen Ma Shousha; Mahmoud Ah Abo Steit; Mohamed Hm Hosny; Wael A Ewais; Ahmad Mm Shalaby
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-08

5.  Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK.

Authors:  Gabi Shemesh; Uri Soiberman; Shimon Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.