OBJECTIVE: This article provides the background for consideration of exposure registries to address potential disease risks in nanomaterial workers. METHODS: The history of exposure registries is reviewed with a focus on their purpose and criteria for establishment. RESULTS: A rationale is presented for developing registries of nanomaterial workers, and unresolved obstacles and challenges are identified. These include issues on inclusion criteria, funding, potential for legal risks, access to data, confidentiality of business information, privacy, and workers' expectations. CONCLUSION: If society is to gain the benefits from nanotechnology, it must take precautions and demonstrate care for those, such as workers, who may be most at risk of adverse effects. Establishing exposure registries is a part of such a precautionary and caring approach.
OBJECTIVE: This article provides the background for consideration of exposure registries to address potential disease risks in nanomaterial workers. METHODS: The history of exposure registries is reviewed with a focus on their purpose and criteria for establishment. RESULTS: A rationale is presented for developing registries of nanomaterial workers, and unresolved obstacles and challenges are identified. These include issues on inclusion criteria, funding, potential for legal risks, access to data, confidentiality of business information, privacy, and workers' expectations. CONCLUSION: If society is to gain the benefits from nanotechnology, it must take precautions and demonstrate care for those, such as workers, who may be most at risk of adverse effects. Establishing exposure registries is a part of such a precautionary and caring approach.
Authors: Irina Guseva Canu; Paul A Schulte; Michael Riediker; Liliya Fatkhutdinova; Enrico Bergamaschi Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: A Blair; C J Hines; K W Thomas; M C R Alavanja; L E Beane Freeman; J A Hoppin; F Kamel; C F Lynch; J H Lubin; D T Silverman; E Whelan; S H Zahm; D P Sandler Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: P A Schulte; C L Geraci; V Murashov; E D Kuempel; R D Zumwalde; V Castranova; M D Hoover; L Hodson; K F Martinez Journal: J Nanopart Res Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Ryan Schlimgen; John Howard; Dawn Wooley; Maureen Thompson; Lindsey R Baden; Otto O Yang; David C Christiani; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; David V Diamond; Elizabeth Gilman Duane; Karen Byers; Thomas Winters; Jeffrey A Gelfand; Gary Fujimoto; T Warner Hudson; Jatin M Vyas Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.162