Are there subtypes of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor?

We have compared the properties of the [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3-binding sites from a number of tissues in an attempt to determine if heterogeneity exists within the Ins(1,4,5)P3-receptor family. The binding of Ins(1,4,5)P3 was characterized in detail by using membranes prepared from human uterine smooth muscle and bovine adrenal cortex. Ins(1,4,5)P3 exhibited an approx. 5 times greater affinity for the binding site in adrenal cortex (KD = 9.81 +/- 1.92 nM) compared with uterine smooth muscle (KD = 37.1 +/- 1.8 nM). The binding was dependent on pH in both tissues, with a maximum at pH 8.3; at this pH various inositol phosphates and nucleotides competed for the binding sites with similar potencies on both tissues. However, the binding of Ins(1,4,5)P3 to the uterine smooth-muscle membranes was Ca2(+)-sensitive, whereas that to the bovine adrenal cortex was not; furthermore, heparin displaced the binding of Ins(1,4,5)P3 in the uterus with an IC50 value (concn. of displacer giving 50% inhibition of specific binding) of 3.9 micrograms/ml (2.5, 6.4; lower, upper range), compared with a value of 22 (13, 30) micrograms/ml in adrenal cortex. In view of the ability of Ins(1,4,5)P3 and heparin to distinguish between these binding sites, their effect on other tissues was examined. Ins(1,4,5)P3 showed a similar affinity for receptors located in the bovine cerebellum to those in the bovine adrenal cortex, but heparin displaced Ins(1,4,5)P3 binding with a 5-fold greater affinity from the cerebellum. Ins(1,4,5)P3 had a 2-fold greater affinity for its receptor with human platelets, as compared with human uterus, but heparin was unable to distinguish between these sites. In guinea-pig ileum, Ins(1,4,5)P3 displayed a similar affinity for the receptors in the longitudinal muscle compared with the circular muscle, but heparin could distinguish between these sites. These data show that small differences exist between tissues, but no clear picture is apparent. It is possible that these results reflect tissue-dependent factors such as phosphorylation, the presence of calmedin etc., rather than the presence of receptor subtypes or species difference.