Literature DB >> 21653801

Differences between liking and wanting signals in the human brain and relations with cognitive dietary restraint and body mass index.

Jurriaan M Born1, Sofie G T Lemmens, Mieke J I Martens, Elia Formisano, Rainer Goebel, Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eating behavior is determined, to a significant extent, by the rewarding value of food (ie, liking and wanting).
OBJECTIVE: We determined brain regions involved in liking and wanting and related brain signaling to body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) and dietary restraint.
DESIGN: Fifteen normal-weight female subjects [mean ± SEM age: 21.5 ± 0.4 y; BMI: 22.2 ± 0.2] completed a food-choice paradigm by using visually displayed food items during functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. Two scans were made as follows: one scan was made in a fasted condition, and one scan was made in a satiated condition. The paradigm discriminated between liking and wanting, and subjects were offered items rated highly for wanting immediately after each scan. Imaging contrasts for high and low liking and wanting were made, and data for regions of interest were extracted. Activation related to liking and wanting, respectively, was determined. Outcomes were correlated to cognitive dietary restraint and BMI.
RESULTS: Dietary restraint predicted liking task-related signaling (TRS) in the amygdala, striatum, thalamus, and cingulate cortex (r = -0.5 ± 0.03, P < 0.00001). In the nucleus accumbens, the premeal liking and wanting TRS and premeal to postmeal liking TRS changes correlated positively with dietary restraint [bilateral average r = 0.6 ± 0.02, P < 0.04 (Bonferroni corrected)]. BMI and hunger predicted wanting TRS in the hypothalamus and striatum (P < 0.05). Postmeal liking TRS in the striatum, anterior insula, and cingulate cortex and wanting TRS in the striatum predicted the energy intake (liking: r = -0.3 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001; wanting: r = -0.3 ± 0.03, P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: Successful dietary restraint was supported by liking TRS from premeal to postmeal in the nucleus accumbens. Reward-related signaling was inversely related to BMI and energy intake, indicating reward deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653801     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.012161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  24 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Neural systems underlying the reappraisal of personally craved foods.

Authors:  Nicole R Giuliani; Traci Mann; A Janet Tomiyama; Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Neuroimaging the interaction of mind and metabolism in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra E D'Agostino; Dana M Small
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 7.422

Review 4.  Approaching the biology of human parental attachment: brain imaging, oxytocin and coordinated assessments of mothers and fathers.

Authors:  J E Swain; P Kim; J Spicer; S S Ho; C J Dayton; A Elmadih; K M Abel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Reward for food odors: an fMRI study of liking and wanting as a function of metabolic state and BMI.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Robert Soussignan; Benoist Schaal; Jean-Pierre Royet
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Reassessing wanting and liking in the study of mesolimbic influence on food intake.

Authors:  Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Wanting and liking: Separable components in problematic eating behavior?

Authors:  Sarah E Polk; Erica M Schulte; Celina R Furman; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Sibutramine promotes amygdala activity under fasting conditions in obese women.

Authors:  Kerstin M Oltmanns; Marcus Heldmann; Susanne Daul; Silke Klose; Michael Rotte; Michael Schäfer; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte; Hendrik Lehnert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Progressive ratio (PR) schedules and the sipometer: Do they measure wanting, liking, and/or reward? A tribute to Anthony Sclafani and Karen Ackroff.

Authors:  H R Kissileff; M Herzog
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Emotional eating and routine restraint scores are associated with activity in brain regions involved in urge and self-control.

Authors:  Samantha M W Wood; Susan M Schembre; Qinghua He; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Susan L Ames; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.