Literature DB >> 21653686

Expression of amphiregulin and EGFRvIII affect outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment.

Ingeborg Tinhofer1, Konrad Klinghammer, Wilko Weichert, Maren Knödler, Albrecht Stenzinger, Thomas Gauler, Volker Budach, Ulrich Keilholz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Constitutive activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a result of gene amplification, mutation, or overexpression of its ligands has been associated with response to EGFR targeting strategies. The role of these molecular mechanisms for the responsiveness of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) to cetuximab-containing regimens remains unknown. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Tumor biopsies from 47 patients, enrolled in a single-arm phase II multicenter study for second-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with cetuximab and docetaxel, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of EGFR, its deletion variant III (EGFRvIII) and its ligand amphiregulin (AREG). The relation between expression levels and disease control rate (DCR) was evaluated by logistic regression. Association between expression levels, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: High expression of EGFR, EGFRvIII, and AREG was detected in 73%, 17%, and 45% of SCCHN cases, respectively. Expression levels of EGFR had no impact on PFS or OS. High expression levels of EGFRvIII were significantly associated with reduced DCR and shortened PFS (HR: 3.3, P = 0.005) but not with OS. Patients with high AREG expression in tumor cells had significantly shortened OS (HR: 2.2, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR 2.2, P = 0.019) compared with patients with low expression score. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed an independent association of AREG and EGFRvIII with PFS but only AREG was an independent prognosticator of OS.
CONCLUSIONS: High EGFRvIII and AREG expression levels identify SCCHN patients who are less likely to benefit from combination treatment with cetuximab and docetaxel. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653686     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

1.  Autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor ligand production and cetuximab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Goro Oshima; Johan Wennerberg; Takashi Yamatodani; Elisabeth Kjellén; Hiroyuki Mineta; Anders Johnsson; Lars Ekblad
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  EGFRwt/vIII-PKM2-β-catenin cascade affects proliferation and chemo-sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chao Jing; Xin Qu; Zhaoqing Li; Chuanqiang Wu; Minghui Zhao; Yu Wang; Shanshan Sun; Shengchi Zhang; Jinliang Chen; Yu Qiao; Xiaomeng Hu; Xiaofeng Yao; Rui Jin; Xudong Wang; Lun Zhang; Xuan Zhou
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  ERK2-dependent reactivation of Akt mediates the limited response of tumor cells with constitutive K-RAS activity to PI3K inhibition.

Authors:  Mahmoud Toulany; Minjmaa Minjgee; Mohammad Saki; Marina Holler; Friedegund Meier; Wolfgang Eicheler; H Peter Rodemann
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Protein-intrinsic and signaling network-based sources of resistance to EGFR- and ErbB family-targeted therapies in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ranee Mehra; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Roland L Dunbrack; Matthew K Robinson; Barbara Burtness; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 18.500

5.  MET activation confers resistance to cetuximab, and prevents HER2 and HER3 upregulation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ofra Novoplansky; Matthew Fury; Manu Prasad; Ksenia Yegodayev; Jonathan Zorea; Limor Cohen; Raphael Pelossof; Liz Cohen; Nora Katabi; Fabiola Cecchi; Ben-Zion Joshua; Aron Popovtzer; Jose Baselga; Maurizio Scaltriti; Moshe Elkabets
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  At the crossroads: EGFR and PTHrP signaling in cancer-mediated diseases of bone.

Authors:  John Foley; Nicole Nickerson; David J Riese; Peter C Hollenhorst; Gwendolen Lorch; Anne M Foley
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 7.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: focus on potential molecular mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  Carolien Boeckx; Marc Baay; An Wouters; Pol Specenier; Jan B Vermorken; Marc Peeters; Filip Lardon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-02

8.  Amphiregulin enhances regulatory T cell-suppressive function via the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Dietmar M W Zaiss; Jorg van Loosdregt; Andrea Gorlani; Cornelis P J Bekker; Andrea Gröne; Maria Sibilia; Paul M P van Bergen en Henegouwen; Rob C Roovers; Paul J Coffer; Alice J A M Sijts
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Membrane-Tethered Intracellular Domain of Amphiregulin Promotes Keratinocyte Proliferation.

Authors:  Stefan W Stoll; Philip E Stuart; Sylviane Lambert; Alberto Gandarillas; Laure Rittié; Andrew Johnston; James T Elder
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  The EGF receptor ligand amphiregulin controls cell division via FoxM1.

Authors:  S W Stoll; P E Stuart; W R Swindell; L C Tsoi; B Li; A Gandarillas; S Lambert; A Johnston; R P Nair; J T Elder
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.