Literature DB >> 21651986

Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals.

Michael B Miller1, Christa-Lynn Donovan, Craig M Bennett, Elissa M Aminoff, Richard E Mayer.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging is being used increasingly to make inferences about an individual. Yet, those inferences are often confounded by the fact that topographical patterns of task-related brain activity can vary greatly from person to person. This study examined two factors that may contribute to the variability across individuals in a memory retrieval task: individual differences in cognitive style and individual differences in encoding strategy. Cognitive style was probed using a battery of assessments focused on the individual's tendency to visualize or verbalize written material. Encoding strategy was probed using a series of questions designed to assess typical strategies that an individual might utilize when trying to remember a list of words. Similarity in brain activity was assessed by cross-correlating individual t-statistic maps contrasting the BOLD response during retrieval to the BOLD response during fixation. Individual differences in cognitive style and encoding strategy accounted for a significant portion of the variance in similarity. This was true above and beyond individual differences in anatomy and memory performance. These results demonstrate the need for a multidimensional approach in the use of fMRI to make inferences about an individual.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21651986     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  Expanding horizons in ergonomics research.

Authors:  Michael I Posner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  A hybrid model for the neural representation of complex mental processing in the human brain.

Authors:  Thorsten Fehr
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Trait-like variants in human functional brain networks.

Authors:  Benjamin A Seitzman; Caterina Gratton; Timothy O Laumann; Evan M Gordon; Babatunde Adeyemo; Ally Dworetsky; Brian T Kraus; Adrian W Gilmore; Jeffrey J Berg; Mario Ortega; Annie Nguyen; Deanna J Greene; Kathleen B McDermott; Steven M Nelson; Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar; Bradley L Schlaggar; Nico U F Dosenbach; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The neuroscience of cognitive-motivational styles: Sign- and goal-trackers as animal models.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Kyra B Phillips
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  The situation or the person? Individual and task-evoked differences in BOLD activity.

Authors:  Taylor Bolt; Jason S Nomi; Sierra A Bainter; Michael W Cole; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Same task, different strategies: how brain networks can be influenced by memory strategy.

Authors:  Lori Sanfratello; Arvind Caprihan; Julia M Stephen; Janice E Knoefel; John C Adair; Clifford Qualls; S Laura Lundy; Cheryl J Aine
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The evolution of cognitive models: From neuropsychology to neuroimaging and back.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a role in self-initiated elaborative cognitive processing during episodic memory encoding: rTMS evidence.

Authors:  Colin Hawco; Marcelo T Berlim; Martin Lepage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Ten problems and solutions when predicting individual outcome from lesion site after stroke.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Thomas M Hope; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.